* Why bcachefs?
@ 2015-08-18 11:29 Emmanuel Florac
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Emmanuel Florac @ 2015-08-18 11:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-bcache
After toying a bit with it, I'm wondering: why bcachefs? I understand
that integrating the filesystem with the cache layer probably makes the
job easier but overall ... we already have several excellent
filesystems; developing a reliable filesystem is DAMN HARD; building a
feature-complete FS is CRAZY HARD (see btrfs); because FTL sucks anyway
and we'd rather wait for ways to move ahead of it...
So Kent, please, tell us, why? :)
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
| <eflorac@intellique.com>
| +33 1 78 94 84 02
------------------------------------------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2015-08-18 11:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-08-18 11:29 Why bcachefs? Emmanuel Florac
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).