From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kent Overstreet Subject: Re: __bch_btree_iter_unlock+0x6a/0xb0 or OpenAFS bug? Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 06:16:18 -0900 Message-ID: <20161116151618.a5sajjqjn6nadxan@kmo-pixel> References: <2bb548a4-cce9-e854-e6e8-4cb3fe86af58@posteo.de> <20161116144056.uiqyfplos6ab7ju6@kmo-pixel> <62855f9f-c1c7-859a-65b8-a378c25212f4@posteo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pg0-f46.google.com ([74.125.83.46]:33732 "EHLO mail-pg0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752263AbcKPPWS (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:22:18 -0500 Received: by mail-pg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id 3so80288836pgd.0 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 07:22:18 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <62855f9f-c1c7-859a-65b8-a378c25212f4@posteo.de> Sender: linux-bcache-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org To: Karl-Philipp Richter Cc: "linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org" On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 04:09:56PM +0100, Karl-Philipp Richter wrote: > > > Am 16.11.2016 um 15:40 schrieb Kent Overstreet: > >> A bcachefs or an OpenAFS bug? I only experience this with the OpenAFS > >> > cache on a one-partition bcachefs mount. > > Where are you getting __bch_btree_iter_unlock() from? > From the right backtrace Ah ok. That's OpenAFS, not bcachefs - the backtrace code isn't reliable, it just finds anything on the stack that looks like a return address.