Linux bcache driver list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.com>
To: shiva rkreddy <shiva.rkreddy@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Wheeler <bcache@lists.ewheeler.net>, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Drop in Iops with fsync when using NVMe as cache
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 10:40:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170222094057.GD31967@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPntomBf8c6TFBLM5iBuX=OWmfQ-uGCUiDdJnXEn1+-gS7KJaw@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:48:06AM -0600, shiva rkreddy wrote:

> fio command without fsync:
> 
> # fio -filename=/dev/bcache0 -direct=1 -ioengine=libaio -rw=randwrite
> -bs=4k -name=mytest -iodepth=1 -runtime=30 -time_based
> 
> iops : 35k
> 
> fio command with fsync:
> 
> fio -filename=/dev/bcache0 -direct=1 -ioengine=libaio -rw=randwrite
> -bs=4k -name=mytest -iodepth=1 -runtime=30 -time_based -fsync=1
> 
> iops: 8.1k

> I'm quite surprised by the drop in iops with fsync turned on. Is this
> expected or am I missing some basic setting?

It's not uncommon that fsync would have a huge performance impact.
Without fsync, most of the data never hits the storage and is only
staying in the system memory.

May I suggest that you try to measure the performance of the same tests
when the filesystem is created on the NVMe device directly, without
using bcache? You're likely to observe a similar pattern.

-- 
Vojtech Pavlik
Director SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-22  9:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-21 16:48 Drop in Iops with fsync when using NVMe as cache shiva rkreddy
2017-02-22  9:40 ` Vojtech Pavlik [this message]
2017-02-22 15:47   ` shiva rkreddy
2017-03-01  0:55     ` Eric Wheeler
2017-03-01  3:00       ` shiva rkreddy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170222094057.GD31967@suse.cz \
    --to=vojtech@suse.com \
    --cc=bcache@lists.ewheeler.net \
    --cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shiva.rkreddy@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox