* [PATCH] [RFC] gfs2: add flag REQ_PRIO for metadata read ahead
@ 2017-07-11 3:09 Coly Li
2017-07-11 20:10 ` Eric Wheeler
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Coly Li @ 2017-07-11 3:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cluster-devel; +Cc: swhiteho, rpeterso, linux-bcache, Coly Li
When gfs2 does metadata read ahead, currently flags (REQ_RAHEAD | REQ_META)
are used to submit bio. Flag REQ_META is just a hint for block trace, not
for block layer code to handle a bio as metadata request.
When doing read ahead for metadata, A REQ_PRIO flag on the metadata bio
is very informative to block layer code. For example, if bcache is used as
a I/O cache for gfs2, it will be possible for bcache code to cache the
pre-fetched metadata blocks on cache device as well, which may be
probably to improve metadata I/O performance if the following requests
hit the cache.
This patch adds REQ_PRIO flag when submitting a metadata readahead bio.
A meta data read ahead bio may come from I/O requests for bitmap,
directoriesmeta or other general metadata request.
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
---
fs/gfs2/bmap.c | 5 +++--
fs/gfs2/dir.c | 4 +++-
fs/gfs2/meta_io.c | 4 +++-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/bmap.c b/fs/gfs2/bmap.c
index 9fa3aef9a5b3..fa3ea29f39cf 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/bmap.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/bmap.c
@@ -291,8 +291,9 @@ static void gfs2_metapath_ra(struct gfs2_glock *gl,
if (trylock_buffer(rabh)) {
if (!buffer_uptodate(rabh)) {
rabh->b_end_io = end_buffer_read_sync;
- submit_bh(REQ_OP_READ, REQ_RAHEAD | REQ_META,
- rabh);
+ submit_bh(REQ_OP_READ,
+ REQ_RAHEAD | REQ_META | REQ_PRIO,
+ rabh);
continue;
}
unlock_buffer(rabh);
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/dir.c b/fs/gfs2/dir.c
index db427658ccd9..0741e4018f8c 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/dir.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/dir.c
@@ -1514,7 +1514,9 @@ static void gfs2_dir_readahead(struct inode *inode, unsigned hsize, u32 index,
continue;
}
bh->b_end_io = end_buffer_read_sync;
- submit_bh(REQ_OP_READ, REQ_RAHEAD | REQ_META, bh);
+ submit_bh(REQ_OP_READ,
+ REQ_RAHEAD | REQ_META | REQ_PRIO,
+ bh);
continue;
}
brelse(bh);
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/meta_io.c b/fs/gfs2/meta_io.c
index fabe1614f879..6103d1c816ef 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/meta_io.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/meta_io.c
@@ -461,7 +461,9 @@ struct buffer_head *gfs2_meta_ra(struct gfs2_glock *gl, u64 dblock, u32 extlen)
bh = gfs2_getbuf(gl, dblock, CREATE);
if (!buffer_uptodate(bh) && !buffer_locked(bh))
- ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ, REQ_RAHEAD | REQ_META, 1, &bh);
+ ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ,
+ REQ_RAHEAD | REQ_META | REQ_PRIO,
+ 1, &bh);
brelse(bh);
dblock++;
extlen--;
--
2.12.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] [RFC] gfs2: add flag REQ_PRIO for metadata read ahead
2017-07-11 3:09 [PATCH] [RFC] gfs2: add flag REQ_PRIO for metadata read ahead Coly Li
@ 2017-07-11 20:10 ` Eric Wheeler
2017-07-12 3:59 ` Coly Li
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eric Wheeler @ 2017-07-11 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Coly Li; +Cc: cluster-devel, swhiteho, rpeterso, linux-bcache
On Tue, 11 Jul 2017, Coly Li wrote:
> When gfs2 does metadata read ahead, currently flags (REQ_RAHEAD | REQ_META)
> are used to submit bio. Flag REQ_META is just a hint for block trace, not
> for block layer code to handle a bio as metadata request.
>
> When doing read ahead for metadata, A REQ_PRIO flag on the metadata bio
> is very informative to block layer code. For example, if bcache is used as
> a I/O cache for gfs2, it will be possible for bcache code to cache the
> pre-fetched metadata blocks on cache device as well, which may be
> probably to improve metadata I/O performance if the following requests
> hit the cache.
>
> This patch adds REQ_PRIO flag when submitting a metadata readahead bio.
> A meta data read ahead bio may come from I/O requests for bitmap,
> directoriesmeta or other general metadata request.
>
Are there any places in gfs2 where REQ_PRIO should be placed on
latency-sensitive metadata writes? They would then writeback in bcache
after the relevant bcache patch is merged.
--
Eric Wheeler
> Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
> ---
> fs/gfs2/bmap.c | 5 +++--
> fs/gfs2/dir.c | 4 +++-
> fs/gfs2/meta_io.c | 4 +++-
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/gfs2/bmap.c b/fs/gfs2/bmap.c
> index 9fa3aef9a5b3..fa3ea29f39cf 100644
> --- a/fs/gfs2/bmap.c
> +++ b/fs/gfs2/bmap.c
> @@ -291,8 +291,9 @@ static void gfs2_metapath_ra(struct gfs2_glock *gl,
> if (trylock_buffer(rabh)) {
> if (!buffer_uptodate(rabh)) {
> rabh->b_end_io = end_buffer_read_sync;
> - submit_bh(REQ_OP_READ, REQ_RAHEAD | REQ_META,
> - rabh);
> + submit_bh(REQ_OP_READ,
> + REQ_RAHEAD | REQ_META | REQ_PRIO,
> + rabh);
> continue;
> }
> unlock_buffer(rabh);
> diff --git a/fs/gfs2/dir.c b/fs/gfs2/dir.c
> index db427658ccd9..0741e4018f8c 100644
> --- a/fs/gfs2/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/gfs2/dir.c
> @@ -1514,7 +1514,9 @@ static void gfs2_dir_readahead(struct inode *inode, unsigned hsize, u32 index,
> continue;
> }
> bh->b_end_io = end_buffer_read_sync;
> - submit_bh(REQ_OP_READ, REQ_RAHEAD | REQ_META, bh);
> + submit_bh(REQ_OP_READ,
> + REQ_RAHEAD | REQ_META | REQ_PRIO,
> + bh);
> continue;
> }
> brelse(bh);
> diff --git a/fs/gfs2/meta_io.c b/fs/gfs2/meta_io.c
> index fabe1614f879..6103d1c816ef 100644
> --- a/fs/gfs2/meta_io.c
> +++ b/fs/gfs2/meta_io.c
> @@ -461,7 +461,9 @@ struct buffer_head *gfs2_meta_ra(struct gfs2_glock *gl, u64 dblock, u32 extlen)
> bh = gfs2_getbuf(gl, dblock, CREATE);
>
> if (!buffer_uptodate(bh) && !buffer_locked(bh))
> - ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ, REQ_RAHEAD | REQ_META, 1, &bh);
> + ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ,
> + REQ_RAHEAD | REQ_META | REQ_PRIO,
> + 1, &bh);
> brelse(bh);
> dblock++;
> extlen--;
> --
> 2.12.0
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] [RFC] gfs2: add flag REQ_PRIO for metadata read ahead
2017-07-11 20:10 ` Eric Wheeler
@ 2017-07-12 3:59 ` Coly Li
2017-07-19 16:05 ` Bob Peterson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Coly Li @ 2017-07-12 3:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Wheeler, Coly Li; +Cc: cluster-devel, swhiteho, rpeterso, linux-bcache
On 2017/7/12 上午4:10, Eric Wheeler wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jul 2017, Coly Li wrote:
>
>> When gfs2 does metadata read ahead, currently flags (REQ_RAHEAD | REQ_META)
>> are used to submit bio. Flag REQ_META is just a hint for block trace, not
>> for block layer code to handle a bio as metadata request.
>>
>> When doing read ahead for metadata, A REQ_PRIO flag on the metadata bio
>> is very informative to block layer code. For example, if bcache is used as
>> a I/O cache for gfs2, it will be possible for bcache code to cache the
>> pre-fetched metadata blocks on cache device as well, which may be
>> probably to improve metadata I/O performance if the following requests
>> hit the cache.
>>
>> This patch adds REQ_PRIO flag when submitting a metadata readahead bio.
>> A meta data read ahead bio may come from I/O requests for bitmap,
>> directoriesmeta or other general metadata request.
>>
>
> Are there any places in gfs2 where REQ_PRIO should be placed on
> latency-sensitive metadata writes? They would then writeback in bcache
> after the relevant bcache patch is merged.
Hi Eric,
I just grep REQ_META in fs/gfs2, there are 10 locations use REQ_META.
Among the 10 locations, REQ_PRIO shows up at 3 locations, another 3
locations are REQ_READAHEAD and I add REQ_PRIO to them, the rested
locations are,
1) log.c:662
In log_write_header(), used to flush gfs2 log header. The author does
not add REQ_PRIO on purpose, because I see REQ_FUA is there. And for no
barrier condition, REQ_PRIO is added with REQ_FUA removed. So it's well
done here.
2) meta_io.c:455
Here gfs2_meta_ra() tries to read first metadata block, cache the
metadata block in bcache should be helpful.
3) ops_fstype.c:250
This is for gfs2_read_sb(), it is only called once by init_sb(), we
don't need to cache this block by bcache.
4) quota.c:733
This is in gfs2_write_buf_to_page() when gfs2 disk quota is updated,
we can have it in cache device.
So it seems REQ_PRIO might be added at meta_io.c:455, and quota.c:733 to
provide more hint to bcache.
Thanks for suggestion.
Coly
>> Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
>> ---
>> fs/gfs2/bmap.c | 5 +++--
>> fs/gfs2/dir.c | 4 +++-
>> fs/gfs2/meta_io.c | 4 +++-
>> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/gfs2/bmap.c b/fs/gfs2/bmap.c
>> index 9fa3aef9a5b3..fa3ea29f39cf 100644
>> --- a/fs/gfs2/bmap.c
>> +++ b/fs/gfs2/bmap.c
>> @@ -291,8 +291,9 @@ static void gfs2_metapath_ra(struct gfs2_glock *gl,
>> if (trylock_buffer(rabh)) {
>> if (!buffer_uptodate(rabh)) {
>> rabh->b_end_io = end_buffer_read_sync;
>> - submit_bh(REQ_OP_READ, REQ_RAHEAD | REQ_META,
>> - rabh);
>> + submit_bh(REQ_OP_READ,
>> + REQ_RAHEAD | REQ_META | REQ_PRIO,
>> + rabh);
>> continue;
>> }
>> unlock_buffer(rabh);
>> diff --git a/fs/gfs2/dir.c b/fs/gfs2/dir.c
>> index db427658ccd9..0741e4018f8c 100644
>> --- a/fs/gfs2/dir.c
>> +++ b/fs/gfs2/dir.c
>> @@ -1514,7 +1514,9 @@ static void gfs2_dir_readahead(struct inode *inode, unsigned hsize, u32 index,
>> continue;
>> }
>> bh->b_end_io = end_buffer_read_sync;
>> - submit_bh(REQ_OP_READ, REQ_RAHEAD | REQ_META, bh);
>> + submit_bh(REQ_OP_READ,
>> + REQ_RAHEAD | REQ_META | REQ_PRIO,
>> + bh);
>> continue;
>> }
>> brelse(bh);
>> diff --git a/fs/gfs2/meta_io.c b/fs/gfs2/meta_io.c
>> index fabe1614f879..6103d1c816ef 100644
>> --- a/fs/gfs2/meta_io.c
>> +++ b/fs/gfs2/meta_io.c
>> @@ -461,7 +461,9 @@ struct buffer_head *gfs2_meta_ra(struct gfs2_glock *gl, u64 dblock, u32 extlen)
>> bh = gfs2_getbuf(gl, dblock, CREATE);
>>
>> if (!buffer_uptodate(bh) && !buffer_locked(bh))
>> - ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ, REQ_RAHEAD | REQ_META, 1, &bh);
>> + ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ,
>> + REQ_RAHEAD | REQ_META | REQ_PRIO,
>> + 1, &bh);
>> brelse(bh);
>> dblock++;
>> extlen--;
>> --
>> 2.12.0
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
Coly Li
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] [RFC] gfs2: add flag REQ_PRIO for metadata read ahead
2017-07-12 3:59 ` Coly Li
@ 2017-07-19 16:05 ` Bob Peterson
2017-07-19 19:03 ` Coly Li
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bob Peterson @ 2017-07-19 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Coly Li; +Cc: Eric Wheeler, Coly Li, cluster-devel, swhiteho, linux-bcache
----- Original Message -----
| >> This patch adds REQ_PRIO flag when submitting a metadata readahead bio.
| >> A meta data read ahead bio may come from I/O requests for bitmap,
| >> directoriesmeta or other general metadata request.
| >>
| >
| > Are there any places in gfs2 where REQ_PRIO should be placed on
| > latency-sensitive metadata writes? They would then writeback in bcache
| > after the relevant bcache patch is merged.
|
| Hi Eric,
|
| I just grep REQ_META in fs/gfs2, there are 10 locations use REQ_META.
| Among the 10 locations, REQ_PRIO shows up at 3 locations, another 3
| locations are REQ_READAHEAD and I add REQ_PRIO to them, the rested
| locations are,
|
| 1) log.c:662
| In log_write_header(), used to flush gfs2 log header. The author does
| not add REQ_PRIO on purpose, because I see REQ_FUA is there. And for no
| barrier condition, REQ_PRIO is added with REQ_FUA removed. So it's well
| done here.
|
| 2) meta_io.c:455
| Here gfs2_meta_ra() tries to read first metadata block, cache the
| metadata block in bcache should be helpful.
|
| 3) ops_fstype.c:250
| This is for gfs2_read_sb(), it is only called once by init_sb(), we
| don't need to cache this block by bcache.
|
| 4) quota.c:733
| This is in gfs2_write_buf_to_page() when gfs2 disk quota is updated,
| we can have it in cache device.
|
| So it seems REQ_PRIO might be added at meta_io.c:455, and quota.c:733 to
| provide more hint to bcache.
|
| Thanks for suggestion.
|
| Coly
Hi Coly,
So does this mean you are revising the patch and I should wait for a new one?
Or is this patch good as it is? BTW, you may want to change
the comment from "directoriesmeta" to "directory meta".
Regards,
Bob Peterson
Red Hat File Systems
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] [RFC] gfs2: add flag REQ_PRIO for metadata read ahead
2017-07-19 16:05 ` Bob Peterson
@ 2017-07-19 19:03 ` Coly Li
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Coly Li @ 2017-07-19 19:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bob Peterson; +Cc: Eric Wheeler, Coly Li, cluster-devel, swhiteho, linux-bcache
On 2017/7/20 上午12:05, Bob Peterson wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> | >> This patch adds REQ_PRIO flag when submitting a metadata readahead bio.
> | >> A meta data read ahead bio may come from I/O requests for bitmap,
> | >> directoriesmeta or other general metadata request.
> | >>
> | >
> | > Are there any places in gfs2 where REQ_PRIO should be placed on
> | > latency-sensitive metadata writes? They would then writeback in bcache
> | > after the relevant bcache patch is merged.
> |
> | Hi Eric,
> |
> | I just grep REQ_META in fs/gfs2, there are 10 locations use REQ_META.
> | Among the 10 locations, REQ_PRIO shows up at 3 locations, another 3
> | locations are REQ_READAHEAD and I add REQ_PRIO to them, the rested
> | locations are,
> |
> | 1) log.c:662
> | In log_write_header(), used to flush gfs2 log header. The author does
> | not add REQ_PRIO on purpose, because I see REQ_FUA is there. And for no
> | barrier condition, REQ_PRIO is added with REQ_FUA removed. So it's well
> | done here.
> |
> | 2) meta_io.c:455
> | Here gfs2_meta_ra() tries to read first metadata block, cache the
> | metadata block in bcache should be helpful.
> |
> | 3) ops_fstype.c:250
> | This is for gfs2_read_sb(), it is only called once by init_sb(), we
> | don't need to cache this block by bcache.
> |
> | 4) quota.c:733
> | This is in gfs2_write_buf_to_page() when gfs2 disk quota is updated,
> | we can have it in cache device.
> |
> | So it seems REQ_PRIO might be added at meta_io.c:455, and quota.c:733 to
> | provide more hint to bcache.
> |
> | Thanks for suggestion.
> |
> | Coly
>
> Hi Coly,
>
> So does this mean you are revising the patch and I should wait for a new one?
> Or is this patch good as it is? BTW, you may want to change
> the comment from "directoriesmeta" to "directory meta".
>
> Regards,
>
Hi Bob,
It's great o hear from you :-)
Yes I will post a V2 (not RFC) patch for review, with comment typo fix.
Thanks for your replying !
--
Coly Li
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-07-19 19:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-07-11 3:09 [PATCH] [RFC] gfs2: add flag REQ_PRIO for metadata read ahead Coly Li
2017-07-11 20:10 ` Eric Wheeler
2017-07-12 3:59 ` Coly Li
2017-07-19 16:05 ` Bob Peterson
2017-07-19 19:03 ` Coly Li
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox