public inbox for linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
To: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, mlyle@lyle.org,
	tang.junhui@zte.com.cn, Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH v1 02/10] bcache: set task properly in allocator_wait()
Date: Wed,  3 Jan 2018 22:03:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180103140325.63175-3-colyli@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180103140325.63175-1-colyli@suse.de>

Kernel thread routine bch_allocator_thread() references macro
allocator_wait() to wait for a condition or quit to do_exit()
when kthread_should_stop() is true.

Macro allocator_wait() has 2 issues in setting task state, let's
see its code piece,

284         while (1) {                                                   \
285                 set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);                \
286                 if (cond)                                             \
287                         break;                                        \
288                                                                       \
289                 mutex_unlock(&(ca)->set->bucket_lock);                \
290                 if (kthread_should_stop())                            \
291                         return 0;                                     \
292                                                                       \
293                 schedule();                                           \
294                 mutex_lock(&(ca)->set->bucket_lock);                  \
295         }                                                             \
296         __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);                            \

1) At line 285, task state is set to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, if at line 290
kthread_should_stop() is true, the kernel thread will terminate and return
to kernel/kthread.s:kthread(), then calls do_exit() with TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE
state. This is not a suggested behavior and a warning message will be
reported by might_sleep() in do_exit() code path: "WARNING: do not call
blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING; state=1 set at [xxxx]".

2) Because task state is set to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE at line 285, when break
while-loop the task state has to be set back to TASK_RUNNING at line 296.
Indeed it is unncessary, if task state is set to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE before
calling schedule() at line 293, we don't need to set the state back to
TASK_RUNNING at line 296 anymore. The reason is, allocator kthread is only
woken up by wake_up_process(), this routine makes sure the task state of
allocator kthread will be TASK_RUNNING after it returns from schedule() at
line 294 (see kernel/sched/core.c:try_to_wake_up() for more detailed
information).

This patch fixes the above 2 issues by,
1) Setting TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE state just before calling schedule().
2) Then setting TASK_RUNNING at line 296 is unnecessary, remove it.

Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
---
 drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c b/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c
index a0cc1bc6d884..48c002faf08d 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c
@@ -282,7 +282,6 @@ static void invalidate_buckets(struct cache *ca)
 #define allocator_wait(ca, cond)					\
 do {									\
 	while (1) {							\
-		set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);			\
 		if (cond)						\
 			break;						\
 									\
@@ -290,10 +289,10 @@ do {									\
 		if (kthread_should_stop())				\
 			return 0;					\
 									\
+		set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);			\
 		schedule();						\
 		mutex_lock(&(ca)->set->bucket_lock);			\
 	}								\
-	__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);				\
 } while (0)
 
 static int bch_allocator_push(struct cache *ca, long bucket)
-- 
2.15.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-01-03 14:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-03 14:03 [PATCH v1 00/10] cache device failure handling improvement Coly Li
2018-01-03 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 01/10] bcache: exit bch_writeback_thread() with proper task state Coly Li
2018-01-03 17:08   ` Michael Lyle
2018-01-05 17:05     ` Coly Li
2018-01-05 17:09       ` Michael Lyle
2018-01-08  7:09   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-08 13:50     ` Coly Li
2018-01-03 14:03 ` Coly Li [this message]
2018-01-03 17:09   ` [PATCH v1 02/10] bcache: set task properly in allocator_wait() Michael Lyle
2018-01-05 17:11     ` Coly Li
2018-01-08  7:10   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-03 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 03/10] bcache: reduce cache_set devices iteration by devices_max_used Coly Li
2018-01-03 17:11   ` Michael Lyle
2018-01-08  7:12   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-03 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 04/10] bcache: fix cached_dev->count usage for bch_cache_set_error() Coly Li
2018-01-08  7:16   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-03 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 05/10] bcache: stop dc->writeback_rate_update if cache set is stopping Coly Li
2018-01-08  7:22   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-08 16:01     ` Coly Li
2018-01-03 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 06/10] bcache: stop dc->writeback_rate_update, dc->writeback_thread earlier Coly Li
2018-01-08  7:25   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-03 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 07/10] bcache: set error_limit correctly Coly Li
2018-01-08  7:26   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-03 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 08/10] bcache: fix misleading error message in bch_count_io_errors() Coly Li
2018-01-03 17:14   ` Michael Lyle
2018-01-08  7:27   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-03 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 09/10] bcache: add io_disable to struct cache_set Coly Li
2018-01-08  7:30   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-03 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 10/10] bcache: stop all attached bcache devices for a retired cache set Coly Li
2018-01-08  7:31   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-03 17:07 ` [PATCH v1 00/10] cache device failure handling improvement Michael Lyle
2018-01-04  2:20   ` Coly Li
2018-01-04 17:46     ` Michael Lyle
2018-01-05  4:04       ` Coly Li
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-01-03 18:29 [PATCH v1 02/10] bcache: set task properly in allocator_wait() tang.junhui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180103140325.63175-3-colyli@suse.de \
    --to=colyli@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mlyle@lyle.org \
    --cc=tang.junhui@zte.com.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox