public inbox for linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
To: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, mlyle@lyle.org,
	tang.junhui@zte.com.cn, Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH v1 03/10] bcache: reduce cache_set devices iteration by devices_max_used
Date: Wed,  3 Jan 2018 22:03:18 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180103140325.63175-4-colyli@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180103140325.63175-1-colyli@suse.de>

Member devices of struct cache_set is used to reference all attached
bcache devices to this cache set. If it is treated as array of pointers,
size of devices[] is indicated by member nr_uuids of struct cache_set.

nr_uuids is calculated in drivers/md/super.c:bch_cache_set_alloc(),
	bucket_bytes(c) / sizeof(struct uuid_entry)
Bucket size is determined by user space tool "make-bcache", by default it
is 1024 sectors (defined in bcache-tools/make-bcache.c:main()). So default
nr_uuids value is 4096 from the above calculation.

Every time when bcache code iterates bcache devices of a cache set, all
the 4096 pointers are checked even only 1 bcache device is attached to the
cache set, that's a wast of time and unncessary.

This patch adds a member devices_max_used to struct cache_set. Its value
is 1 + the maximum used index of devices[] in a cache set. When iterating
all valid bcache devices of a cache set, use c->devices_max_used in
for-loop may reduce a lot of useless checking.

Personally, my motivation of this patch is not for performance, I use it
in bcache debugging, which helps me to narrow down the scape to check
valid bcached devices of a cache set.

Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
---
 drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h    | 1 +
 drivers/md/bcache/btree.c     | 2 +-
 drivers/md/bcache/super.c     | 9 ++++++---
 drivers/md/bcache/writeback.h | 2 +-
 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h b/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h
index 843877e017e1..83c569942bd0 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h
@@ -488,6 +488,7 @@ struct cache_set {
 	int			caches_loaded;
 
 	struct bcache_device	**devices;
+	unsigned		devices_max_used;
 	struct list_head	cached_devs;
 	uint64_t		cached_dev_sectors;
 	struct closure		caching;
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
index 81e8dc3dbe5e..bf0d7978bc3d 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
@@ -1678,7 +1678,7 @@ static void bch_btree_gc_finish(struct cache_set *c)
 
 	/* don't reclaim buckets to which writeback keys point */
 	rcu_read_lock();
-	for (i = 0; i < c->nr_uuids; i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < c->devices_max_used; i++) {
 		struct bcache_device *d = c->devices[i];
 		struct cached_dev *dc;
 		struct keybuf_key *w, *n;
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
index b4d28928dec5..064efd869017 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
@@ -721,6 +721,9 @@ static void bcache_device_attach(struct bcache_device *d, struct cache_set *c,
 	d->c = c;
 	c->devices[id] = d;
 
+	if (id >= c->devices_max_used)
+		c->devices_max_used = id + 1;
+
 	closure_get(&c->caching);
 }
 
@@ -1261,7 +1264,7 @@ static int flash_devs_run(struct cache_set *c)
 	struct uuid_entry *u;
 
 	for (u = c->uuids;
-	     u < c->uuids + c->nr_uuids && !ret;
+	     u < c->uuids + c->devices_max_used && !ret;
 	     u++)
 		if (UUID_FLASH_ONLY(u))
 			ret = flash_dev_run(c, u);
@@ -1427,7 +1430,7 @@ static void __cache_set_unregister(struct closure *cl)
 
 	mutex_lock(&bch_register_lock);
 
-	for (i = 0; i < c->nr_uuids; i++)
+	for (i = 0; i < c->devices_max_used; i++)
 		if (c->devices[i]) {
 			if (!UUID_FLASH_ONLY(&c->uuids[i]) &&
 			    test_bit(CACHE_SET_UNREGISTERING, &c->flags)) {
@@ -1490,7 +1493,7 @@ struct cache_set *bch_cache_set_alloc(struct cache_sb *sb)
 	c->bucket_bits		= ilog2(sb->bucket_size);
 	c->block_bits		= ilog2(sb->block_size);
 	c->nr_uuids		= bucket_bytes(c) / sizeof(struct uuid_entry);
-
+	c->devices_max_used	= 0;
 	c->btree_pages		= bucket_pages(c);
 	if (c->btree_pages > BTREE_MAX_PAGES)
 		c->btree_pages = max_t(int, c->btree_pages / 4,
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.h b/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.h
index a9e3ffb4b03c..1d284f3d0363 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.h
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.h
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ static inline uint64_t  bcache_flash_devs_sectors_dirty(struct cache_set *c)
 
 	mutex_lock(&bch_register_lock);
 
-	for (i = 0; i < c->nr_uuids; i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < c->devices_max_used; i++) {
 		struct bcache_device *d = c->devices[i];
 
 		if (!d || !UUID_FLASH_ONLY(&c->uuids[i]))
-- 
2.15.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-01-03 14:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-03 14:03 [PATCH v1 00/10] cache device failure handling improvement Coly Li
2018-01-03 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 01/10] bcache: exit bch_writeback_thread() with proper task state Coly Li
2018-01-03 17:08   ` Michael Lyle
2018-01-05 17:05     ` Coly Li
2018-01-05 17:09       ` Michael Lyle
2018-01-08  7:09   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-08 13:50     ` Coly Li
2018-01-03 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 02/10] bcache: set task properly in allocator_wait() Coly Li
2018-01-03 17:09   ` Michael Lyle
2018-01-05 17:11     ` Coly Li
2018-01-08  7:10   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-03 14:03 ` Coly Li [this message]
2018-01-03 17:11   ` [PATCH v1 03/10] bcache: reduce cache_set devices iteration by devices_max_used Michael Lyle
2018-01-08  7:12   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-03 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 04/10] bcache: fix cached_dev->count usage for bch_cache_set_error() Coly Li
2018-01-08  7:16   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-03 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 05/10] bcache: stop dc->writeback_rate_update if cache set is stopping Coly Li
2018-01-08  7:22   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-08 16:01     ` Coly Li
2018-01-03 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 06/10] bcache: stop dc->writeback_rate_update, dc->writeback_thread earlier Coly Li
2018-01-08  7:25   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-03 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 07/10] bcache: set error_limit correctly Coly Li
2018-01-08  7:26   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-03 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 08/10] bcache: fix misleading error message in bch_count_io_errors() Coly Li
2018-01-03 17:14   ` Michael Lyle
2018-01-08  7:27   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-03 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 09/10] bcache: add io_disable to struct cache_set Coly Li
2018-01-08  7:30   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-03 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 10/10] bcache: stop all attached bcache devices for a retired cache set Coly Li
2018-01-08  7:31   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-03 17:07 ` [PATCH v1 00/10] cache device failure handling improvement Michael Lyle
2018-01-04  2:20   ` Coly Li
2018-01-04 17:46     ` Michael Lyle
2018-01-05  4:04       ` Coly Li
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-01-03 19:14 [PATCH v1 03/10] bcache: reduce cache_set devices iteration by devices_max_used tang.junhui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180103140325.63175-4-colyli@suse.de \
    --to=colyli@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mlyle@lyle.org \
    --cc=tang.junhui@zte.com.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox