From: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
To: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Tang Junhui <tang.junhui@zte.com.cn>
Subject: [PATCH v4 09/13] bcache: fix inaccurate io state for detached bcache devices
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2018 22:24:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180127142406.89741-10-colyli@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180127142406.89741-1-colyli@suse.de>
From: Tang Junhui <tang.junhui@zte.com.cn>
When we run IO in a detached device, and run iostat to shows IO status,
normally it will show like bellow (Omitted some fields):
Device: ... avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await r_await w_await svctm %util
sdd ... 15.89 0.53 1.82 0.20 2.23 1.81 52.30
bcache0 ... 15.89 115.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.40 69.60
but after IO stopped, there are still very big avgqu-sz and %util
values as bellow:
Device: ... avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await r_await w_await svctm %util
bcache0 ... 0 5326.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.10
The reason for this issue is that, only generic_start_io_acct() called
and no generic_end_io_acct() called for detached device in
cached_dev_make_request(). See the code:
//start generic_start_io_acct()
generic_start_io_acct(q, rw, bio_sectors(bio), &d->disk->part0);
if (cached_dev_get(dc)) {
//will callback generic_end_io_acct()
}
else {
//will not call generic_end_io_acct()
}
This patch calls generic_end_io_acct() in the end of IO for detached
devices, so we can show IO state correctly.
(Modified to use GFP_NOIO in kzalloc() by Coly Li)
Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui <tang.junhui@zte.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
---
drivers/md/bcache/request.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
index 02296bda6384..e09c5ae745be 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
@@ -986,6 +986,55 @@ static void cached_dev_nodata(struct closure *cl)
continue_at(cl, cached_dev_bio_complete, NULL);
}
+struct detached_dev_io_private {
+ struct bcache_device *d;
+ unsigned long start_time;
+ bio_end_io_t *bi_end_io;
+ void *bi_private;
+};
+
+static void detatched_dev_end_io(struct bio *bio)
+{
+ struct detached_dev_io_private *ddip;
+
+ ddip = bio->bi_private;
+ bio->bi_end_io = ddip->bi_end_io;
+ bio->bi_private = ddip->bi_private;
+
+ generic_end_io_acct(ddip->d->disk->queue,
+ bio_data_dir(bio),
+ &ddip->d->disk->part0, ddip->start_time);
+
+ kfree(ddip);
+
+ bio->bi_end_io(bio);
+}
+
+static void detached_dev_do_request(struct bcache_device *d, struct bio *bio)
+{
+ struct detached_dev_io_private *ddip;
+ struct cached_dev *dc = container_of(d, struct cached_dev, disk);
+
+ /*
+ * no need to call closure_get(&dc->disk.cl),
+ * because upper layer had already opened bcache device,
+ * which would call closure_get(&dc->disk.cl)
+ */
+ ddip = kzalloc(sizeof(struct detached_dev_io_private), GFP_NOIO);
+ ddip->d = d;
+ ddip->start_time = jiffies;
+ ddip->bi_end_io = bio->bi_end_io;
+ ddip->bi_private = bio->bi_private;
+ bio->bi_end_io = detatched_dev_end_io;
+ bio->bi_private = ddip;
+
+ if ((bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_DISCARD) &&
+ !blk_queue_discard(bdev_get_queue(dc->bdev)))
+ bio->bi_end_io(bio);
+ else
+ generic_make_request(bio);
+}
+
/* Cached devices - read & write stuff */
static blk_qc_t cached_dev_make_request(struct request_queue *q,
@@ -1028,13 +1077,8 @@ static blk_qc_t cached_dev_make_request(struct request_queue *q,
else
cached_dev_read(dc, s);
}
- } else {
- if ((bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_DISCARD) &&
- !blk_queue_discard(bdev_get_queue(dc->bdev)))
- bio_endio(bio);
- else
- generic_make_request(bio);
- }
+ } else
+ detached_dev_do_request(d, bio);
return BLK_QC_T_NONE;
}
--
2.15.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-27 22:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-27 14:23 [PATCH v4 00/13] bcache: device failure handling improvement Coly Li
2018-01-27 14:23 ` [PATCH v4 01/13] bcache: set writeback_rate_update_seconds in range [1, 60] seconds Coly Li
2018-02-01 21:44 ` Michael Lyle
2018-01-27 14:23 ` [PATCH v4 02/13] bcache: properly set task state in bch_writeback_thread() Coly Li
2018-02-01 21:45 ` Michael Lyle
2018-01-27 14:23 ` [PATCH v4 03/13] bcache: fix cached_dev->count usage for bch_cache_set_error() Coly Li
2018-01-27 14:23 ` [PATCH v4 04/13] bcache: quit dc->writeback_thread when BCACHE_DEV_DETACHING is set Coly Li
2018-01-27 14:23 ` [PATCH v4 05/13] bcache: stop dc->writeback_rate_update properly Coly Li
2018-01-27 14:23 ` [PATCH v4 06/13] bcache: set error_limit correctly Coly Li
2018-02-01 21:49 ` Michael Lyle
2018-01-27 14:24 ` [PATCH v4 07/13] bcache: add CACHE_SET_IO_DISABLE to struct cache_set flags Coly Li
2018-01-27 14:24 ` [PATCH v4 08/13] bcache: stop all attached bcache devices for a retired cache set Coly Li
2018-01-27 14:24 ` Coly Li [this message]
2018-01-27 14:24 ` [PATCH v4 10/13] bcache: add backing_request_endio() for bi_end_io of attached backing device I/O Coly Li
2018-01-27 14:24 ` [PATCH v4 11/13] bcache: add io_disable to struct cached_dev Coly Li
2018-01-27 14:24 ` [PATCH v4 12/13] bcache: stop bcache device when backing device is offline Coly Li
2018-01-27 14:24 ` [PATCH v4 13/13] bcache: add stop_when_cache_set_failed to struct cached_dev Coly Li
2018-01-28 3:33 ` Pavel Goran
2018-01-28 4:32 ` Coly Li
2018-01-28 5:55 ` Re[2]: " Pavel Goran
2018-01-28 9:39 ` Coly Li
2018-01-29 12:57 ` Nix
2018-01-29 13:02 ` Coly Li
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-01-28 1:56 [PATCH v4 00/13] bcache: device failure handling improvement Coly Li
2018-01-28 1:56 ` [PATCH v4 09/13] bcache: fix inaccurate io state for detached bcache devices Coly Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180127142406.89741-10-colyli@suse.de \
--to=colyli@suse.de \
--cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tang.junhui@zte.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).