From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] lib: add crc64 calculation routines Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:22:46 -0700 Message-ID: <20180725142246.23e354fcc21ef041bb3f87e6@linux-foundation.org> References: <20180718165545.1622-1-colyli@suse.de> <20180718165545.1622-2-colyli@suse.de> <20180724042637.GA1944@sol.localdomain> <399c1cc851f983370a0308c76c68a97ff41a5d4f.camel@linux.intel.com> <01f8e352-a49f-2f41-6264-bb6395bb0bf2@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <01f8e352-a49f-2f41-6264-bb6395bb0bf2@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Coly Li Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Eric Biggers , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Michael Lyle , Kent Overstreet , Linus Torvalds , Thomas Gleixner , Kate Stewart , Randy Dunlap List-Id: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 10:37:23 +0800 Coly Li wrote: > > IIUC this series in Andrew's quilt. So, it's still possible to replace > > it with better one, I suppose. Ask Andrew (at least I remember recent > > case where he just replaced series by fixed one). > > Hi Andrew, > > It seems there should be some fix/update for this series. I see current > series is in linux-next for now. If I want to add the fix, should I post > a new version of the series, or the incremental patches to fix current > series ? mm... it sounds like the changes will be large, so probably a new series would be better at this early stage. If the changes are small then little fixup patches would be nicer to the people who have already reviewed v1.