From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nathan Chancellor Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcache: avoid clang -Wunintialized warning Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 09:03:50 -0700 Message-ID: <20190322160350.GE21978@archlinux-ryzen> References: <20190322143507.1256436-1-arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190322143507.1256436-1-arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Coly Li , Kent Overstreet , clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, Nick Desaulniers , Jens Axboe , Shenghui Wang , Hannes Reinecke , linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 03:35:00PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > clang has identified a code path in which it thinks a > variable may be unused: > > drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c:333:4: error: variable 'bucket' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false > [-Werror,-Wsometimes-uninitialized] > fifo_pop(&ca->free_inc, bucket); > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > drivers/md/bcache/util.h:219:27: note: expanded from macro 'fifo_pop' > #define fifo_pop(fifo, i) fifo_pop_front(fifo, (i)) > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > drivers/md/bcache/util.h:189:6: note: expanded from macro 'fifo_pop_front' > if (_r) { \ > ^~ > drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c:343:46: note: uninitialized use occurs here > allocator_wait(ca, bch_allocator_push(ca, bucket)); > ^~~~~~ > drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c:287:7: note: expanded from macro 'allocator_wait' > if (cond) \ > ^~~~ > drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c:333:4: note: remove the 'if' if its condition is always true > fifo_pop(&ca->free_inc, bucket); > ^ > drivers/md/bcache/util.h:219:27: note: expanded from macro 'fifo_pop' > #define fifo_pop(fifo, i) fifo_pop_front(fifo, (i)) > ^ > drivers/md/bcache/util.h:189:2: note: expanded from macro 'fifo_pop_front' > if (_r) { \ > ^ > drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c:331:15: note: initialize the variable 'bucket' to silence this warning > long bucket; > ^ > > This cannot happen in practice because we only enter the loop > if there is at least one element in the list. > > Slightly rearranging the code makes this clearer to both the > reader and the compiler, which avoids the warning. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Yes, I like this much better than my patch, thanks! Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor > --- > drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c b/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c > index 5002838ea476..f8986effcb50 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c > +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c > @@ -327,10 +327,11 @@ static int bch_allocator_thread(void *arg) > * possibly issue discards to them, then we add the bucket to > * the free list: > */ > - while (!fifo_empty(&ca->free_inc)) { > + while (1) { > long bucket; > > - fifo_pop(&ca->free_inc, bucket); > + if (!fifo_pop(&ca->free_inc, bucket)) > + break; > > if (ca->discard) { > mutex_unlock(&ca->set->bucket_lock); > -- > 2.20.0 >