From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 157/167] bcache: only clear BTREE_NODE_dirty bit when it is set
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 12:25:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190903162519.7136-157-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190903162519.7136-1-sashal@kernel.org>
From: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
[ Upstream commit e5ec5f4765ada9c75fb3eee93a6e72f0e50599d5 ]
In bch_btree_cache_free() and btree_node_free(), BTREE_NODE_dirty is
always set no matter btree node is dirty or not. The code looks like
this,
if (btree_node_dirty(b))
btree_complete_write(b, btree_current_write(b));
clear_bit(BTREE_NODE_dirty, &b->flags);
Indeed if btree_node_dirty(b) returns false, it means BTREE_NODE_dirty
bit is cleared, then it is unnecessary to clear the bit again.
This patch only clears BTREE_NODE_dirty when btree_node_dirty(b) is
true (the bit is set), to save a few CPU cycles.
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
drivers/md/bcache/btree.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
index 3f4211b5cd334..8c80833e73a9a 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
@@ -772,10 +772,10 @@ void bch_btree_cache_free(struct cache_set *c)
while (!list_empty(&c->btree_cache)) {
b = list_first_entry(&c->btree_cache, struct btree, list);
- if (btree_node_dirty(b))
+ if (btree_node_dirty(b)) {
btree_complete_write(b, btree_current_write(b));
- clear_bit(BTREE_NODE_dirty, &b->flags);
-
+ clear_bit(BTREE_NODE_dirty, &b->flags);
+ }
mca_data_free(b);
}
@@ -1063,9 +1063,10 @@ static void btree_node_free(struct btree *b)
mutex_lock(&b->write_lock);
- if (btree_node_dirty(b))
+ if (btree_node_dirty(b)) {
btree_complete_write(b, btree_current_write(b));
- clear_bit(BTREE_NODE_dirty, &b->flags);
+ clear_bit(BTREE_NODE_dirty, &b->flags);
+ }
mutex_unlock(&b->write_lock);
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-03 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20190903162519.7136-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2019-09-03 16:23 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 063/167] bcache: replace hard coded number with BUCKET_GC_GEN_MAX Sasha Levin
2019-09-03 16:23 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 064/167] bcache: treat stale && dirty keys as bad keys Sasha Levin
2019-09-03 16:25 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2019-09-03 16:25 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 158/167] bcache: add comments for mutex_lock(&b->write_lock) Sasha Levin
2019-09-03 16:25 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 159/167] bcache: fix race in btree_flush_write() Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190903162519.7136-157-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=colyli@suse.de \
--cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).