From: colyli@suse.de
To: axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH 15/17] bcache: remove member accessed from struct btree
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 01:01:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200123170142.98974-16-colyli@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200123170142.98974-1-colyli@suse.de>
From: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
The member 'accessed' of struct btree is used in bch_mca_scan() when
shrinking btree node caches. The original idea is, if b->accessed is
set, clean it and look at next btree node cache from c->btree_cache
list, and only shrink the caches whose b->accessed is cleaned. Then
only cold btree node cache will be shrunk.
But when I/O pressure is high, it is very probably that b->accessed
of a btree node cache will be set again in bch_btree_node_get()
before bch_mca_scan() selects it again. Then there is no chance for
bch_mca_scan() to shrink enough memory back to slub or slab system.
This patch removes member accessed from struct btree, then once a
btree node ache is selected, it will be immediately shunk. By this
change, bch_mca_scan() may release btree node cahce more efficiently.
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
---
drivers/md/bcache/btree.c | 8 ++------
drivers/md/bcache/btree.h | 2 --
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
index 14d6c33b0957..357535a5c89c 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
@@ -754,14 +754,12 @@ static unsigned long bch_mca_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
b = list_first_entry(&c->btree_cache, struct btree, list);
list_rotate_left(&c->btree_cache);
- if (!b->accessed &&
- !mca_reap(b, 0, false)) {
+ if (!mca_reap(b, 0, false)) {
mca_bucket_free(b);
mca_data_free(b);
rw_unlock(true, b);
freed++;
- } else
- b->accessed = 0;
+ }
}
out:
mutex_unlock(&c->bucket_lock);
@@ -1069,7 +1067,6 @@ struct btree *bch_btree_node_get(struct cache_set *c, struct btree_op *op,
BUG_ON(!b->written);
b->parent = parent;
- b->accessed = 1;
for (; i <= b->keys.nsets && b->keys.set[i].size; i++) {
prefetch(b->keys.set[i].tree);
@@ -1160,7 +1157,6 @@ struct btree *__bch_btree_node_alloc(struct cache_set *c, struct btree_op *op,
goto retry;
}
- b->accessed = 1;
b->parent = parent;
bch_bset_init_next(&b->keys, b->keys.set->data, bset_magic(&b->c->sb));
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.h b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.h
index 76cfd121a486..f4dcca449391 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.h
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.h
@@ -121,8 +121,6 @@ struct btree {
/* Key/pointer for this btree node */
BKEY_PADDED(key);
- /* Single bit - set when accessed, cleared by shrinker */
- unsigned long accessed;
unsigned long seq;
struct rw_semaphore lock;
struct cache_set *c;
--
2.16.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-23 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-23 17:01 [PATCH 00/17] bcache patches for Linux v5.6 colyli
2020-01-23 17:01 ` [PATCH 01/17] bcache: cached_dev_free needs to put the sb page colyli
2020-01-23 17:01 ` [PATCH 02/17] bcache: use a separate data structure for the on-disk super block colyli
2020-01-23 17:01 ` [PATCH 03/17] bcache: rework error unwinding in register_bcache colyli
2020-01-23 17:01 ` [PATCH 04/17] bcache: properly initialize 'path' and 'err' in register_bcache() colyli
2020-01-23 17:01 ` [PATCH 05/17] bcache: fix use-after-free " colyli
2020-01-23 17:01 ` [PATCH 06/17] bcache: transfer the sb_page reference to register_{bdev,cache} colyli
2020-01-23 17:01 ` [PATCH 07/17] bcache: return a pointer to the on-disk sb from read_super colyli
2020-01-23 17:01 ` [PATCH 08/17] bcache: store a pointer to the on-disk sb in the cache and cached_dev structures colyli
2020-01-23 17:01 ` [PATCH 09/17] bcache: use read_cache_page_gfp to read the superblock colyli
2020-01-23 17:01 ` [PATCH 10/17] lib: crc64: include <linux/crc64.h> for 'crc64_be' colyli
2020-01-23 17:01 ` [PATCH 11/17] bcache: add code comments for state->pool in __btree_sort() colyli
2020-01-23 17:01 ` [PATCH 12/17] bcache: avoid unnecessary btree nodes flushing in btree_flush_write() colyli
2020-01-23 17:01 ` [PATCH 13/17] bcache: print written and keys in trace_bcache_btree_write colyli
2020-01-23 17:01 ` [PATCH 14/17] bcache: back to cache all readahead I/Os colyli
2020-01-23 17:19 ` Michael Lyle
2020-01-23 17:27 ` Coly Li
2020-01-23 18:31 ` Jens Axboe
2020-01-24 0:49 ` Coly Li
2020-01-24 1:14 ` Jens Axboe
2020-01-24 16:48 ` Michael Lyle
2020-01-23 17:01 ` colyli [this message]
2020-01-23 17:01 ` [PATCH 16/17] bcache: reap c->btree_cache_freeable from the tail in bch_mca_scan() colyli
2020-01-23 17:01 ` [PATCH 17/17] bcache: reap from tail of c->btree_cache " colyli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200123170142.98974-16-colyli@suse.de \
--to=colyli@suse.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox