From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] bcache: ignore pending signals in bcache_device_init() Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 17:03:07 +0100 Message-ID: <20200303160307.GI4380@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20200302093450.48016-1-colyli@suse.de> <20200302093450.48016-2-colyli@suse.de> <20200302122748.GH4380@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20200302134919.GB9769@redhat.com> <20200303080544.GW4380@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20200303121918.GA27520@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200303121918.GA27520@redhat.com> Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Coly Li , axboe@kernel.dk, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, hare@suse.de, mkoutny@suse.com List-Id: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org On Tue 03-03-20 13:19:18, Oleg Nesterov wrote: [...] > but I am not sure this optmization makes sense. I would much rather start with a clarification on what should be use what shouldn't. Because as of now, people tend to copy patterns which are broken or simply do not make any sense at all. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs