From: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
To: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH 10/14] bcache: don't check seq numbers in register_cache_set()
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 12:10:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200815041043.45116-11-colyli@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200815041043.45116-1-colyli@suse.de>
In order to update the partial super block of cache set, the seq numbers
of cache and cache set are checked in register_cache_set(). If cache's
seq number is larger than cache set's seq number, cache set must update
its partial super block from cache's super block. It is unncessary when
the embedded struct cache_sb is removed from struct cache set.
This patch removed the seq numbers checking from register_cache_set(),
because later there will be no such partial super block in struct cache
set, the cache set will directly reference in-memory super block from
struct cache. This is a preparation patch for removing embedded struct
cache_sb from struct cache_set.
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
---
drivers/md/bcache/super.c | 15 ---------------
1 file changed, 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
index 05c5a7e867bb..4ba713d0d9b0 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
@@ -2160,21 +2160,6 @@ static const char *register_cache_set(struct cache *ca)
sysfs_create_link(&c->kobj, &ca->kobj, buf))
goto err;
- /*
- * A special case is both ca->sb.seq and c->sb.seq are 0,
- * such condition happens on a new created cache device whose
- * super block is never flushed yet. In this case c->sb.version
- * and other members should be updated too, otherwise we will
- * have a mistaken super block version in cache set.
- */
- if (ca->sb.seq > c->sb.seq || c->sb.seq == 0) {
- c->sb.version = ca->sb.version;
- memcpy(c->set_uuid, ca->sb.set_uuid, 16);
- c->sb.flags = ca->sb.flags;
- c->sb.seq = ca->sb.seq;
- pr_debug("set version = %llu\n", c->sb.version);
- }
-
kobject_get(&ca->kobj);
ca->set = c;
ca->set->cache = ca;
--
2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-15 21:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-15 4:10 [PATCH 00/14] bcache: remove multiple caches code framework Coly Li
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 01/14] bcache: remove 'int n' from parameter list of bch_bucket_alloc_set() Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:08 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 02/14] bcache: explicitly make cache_set only have single cache Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:11 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 03/14] bcache: remove for_each_cache() Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:13 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-22 11:40 ` Coly Li
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 04/14] bcache: add set_uuid in struct cache_set Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:15 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 05/14] bcache: only use block_bytes() on struct cache Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:16 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 06/14] bcache: remove useless alloc_bucket_pages() Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:17 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 07/14] bcache: remove useless bucket_pages() Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:18 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 08/14] bcache: only use bucket_bytes() on struct cache Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:19 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 09/14] bcache: avoid data copy between cache_set->sb and cache->sb Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:22 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-17 6:30 ` Coly Li
2020-08-15 4:10 ` Coly Li [this message]
2020-08-17 6:23 ` [PATCH 10/14] bcache: don't check seq numbers in register_cache_set() Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 11/14] bcache: remove can_attach_cache() Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:24 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 12/14] bcache: check and set sync status on cache's in-memory super block Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:25 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 13/14] bcache: remove embedded struct cache_sb from struct cache_set Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:26 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 14/14] bcache: move struct cache_sb out of uapi bcache.h Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:36 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-17 7:10 ` Coly Li
2020-08-17 10:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-17 11:48 ` Coly Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200815041043.45116-11-colyli@suse.de \
--to=colyli@suse.de \
--cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox