From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECBABC433EF for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 12:08:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239143AbiCJMJG (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Mar 2022 07:09:06 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45988 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236088AbiCJMJF (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Mar 2022 07:09:05 -0500 Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 883AEE6DB5 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 04:08:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1646914084; x=1678450084; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=+6vvAqSDQcbKNmERXFjqEl0AldkatYOiVu9+f3dQU3c=; b=ayLVNmIeqSnrCttg85Outgh+hBogVBrX5gizKa7NMN5UOzjaD8eExHMf W88elD66Qy+na6eXljZcryc8aKUs2aWe5dKlxF2SJJ+rEqi+1iTf3aSNJ jaR08qYnf6xGFtdXkLytw7+ghqtR6xeLh5yXuZxtg31D/59zExH7TJd4U EOO0u+FxuEd9YruUHeBxyIuYz/3XVhrUZvx7MnQdweOY9ux5XHKf4u0gC 2J+ACxJ9FGEnSg2PDa+fyNN9EDhqsB5/OEfu5Dh/EehPjrpIb5Qr/0GnK dZ+HyLgIrCKtpf34FSr1iZ1RDrncfuF1r2VfZ51VOuL/YShL8UrrRgWUH g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10281"; a="279971169" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,170,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="279971169" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Mar 2022 04:08:03 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,170,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="578774310" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO 89b41b6ae01c) ([10.239.97.151]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Mar 2022 04:08:01 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 89b41b6ae01c with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nSHaL-0004tZ-0X; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 12:08:01 +0000 Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 20:07:08 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Andrea Tomassetti , linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, Coly Li , Kent Overstreet , Zhang Zhen , Andrea Tomassetti Subject: [RFC PATCH] bcache: bch_service_ioctl_ctrl() can be static Message-ID: <20220310120708.GA86940@32b0ac190af4> References: <20220310085240.334068-1-andrea.tomassetti@devo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220310085240.334068-1-andrea.tomassetti@devo.com> X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org drivers/md/bcache/control.c:18:6: warning: symbol 'bch_service_ioctl_ctrl' was not declared. Should it be static? Reported-by: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: kernel test robot --- drivers/md/bcache/control.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/control.c b/drivers/md/bcache/control.c index dad432613474b..69b5e554d0935 100644 --- a/drivers/md/bcache/control.c +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/control.c @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ static struct bch_ctrl_device _control_device; /* this handles IOCTL for /dev/bcache_ctrl */ /*********************************************/ -long bch_service_ioctl_ctrl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, +static long bch_service_ioctl_ctrl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) { int retval = 0;