Re: New stuff up in git

[Greg Bowyer <gbowyer-97jfqw80gc69FHfhHBbuYA@public.gmane.org>]

Sorry for the delay I was away over the weekend, my changes (minimal as 
they are) are on github

https://github.com/GregBowyer/linux-bcache

I didn't spend much time working out compile errors if I put on 
debugging, they should be pretty easy to fix, I just wanted to play
I also didn't realize that I needed to format the backing device 
separate to the cache device, I have not had a chance to fully test 
everything, I will try it out over the next few days.

Do you want me to give this a more serious look over ?

On 09/09/11 16:12, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> Nice. If you want to push/email your changes I'll merge them into the
> bcache-3.1 branch.
>
> Now if only I had some up to date documentation... :)
>
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Greg Bowyer<gbowyer-97jfqw80gc69FHfhHBbuYA@public.gmane.org>  wrote:
>> On 09/09/11 15:27, Kent Overstreet wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Greg Bowyer<gbowyer-97jfqw80gc69FHfhHBbuYA@public.gmane.org>
>>>   wrote:
>>>> Sorry if this is a dumb question, is bcache-3.1 an update to bcache for
>>>> kernels 3.1+
>>> It's the current bcache code rebased onto 3.1, yeah.
>>>
>>>> I ask because I dumbly merged bcache onto the v3.0 tag today since I want
>>>> to
>>>> have a play with bcache
>>> Heh. Did you get it to compile/boot? the bcache-3.1 branch isn't
>>> _quite_ that far.
>> I did get to compile and boot, although I took the bcache branch and not
>> bcache-3.1 (when I say compile it wont compile if I have debugging turned
>> on, but I am ignoring that :S)
>>>> On 08/09/11 01:49, Kent Overstreet wrote:
>>>>> I just finished updating both the bcache (off 2.6.34) and the
>>>>> bcache-3.1 branches with the latest stable code.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also got cgit set up and working, finally. Need to stick a link in the
>>>>> wiki to it..
>>>>>
>>>>> http://evilpiepirate.org/git
>>>>>
>>>>> I still haven't figured out how to pack a git repository so cloning it
>>>>> doesn't take>      80% of my linode's ram, but cloning works for me so I'm
>>>>> done screwing with it for now.
>>>>>
>>>>> The bcache branch compiles but hasn't been tested. I don't expect any
>>>>> issues though, it's pretty close to what I normally develop/test on.
>>>>>
>>>>> The bcache-3.1 branch still doesn't quite compile, but it's pretty
>>>>> close - I'm try and get a working version pushed tomorrow, I did boot
>>>>> a linux 3.1 + bcache kernel at one point...
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache"
>>>> in
>>>> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
>>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>>
>>