Re: bcache: for-next unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000019

[Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@profihost.ag>]

Am 23.10.2017 um 18:48 schrieb Michael Lyle:
> On 10/23/2017 07:26 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>> It seems i'm missing a5f3d8a5eaaf but i have 09b3efec81de.
>>
>> I missed it because
>> git log ..linux-block/for-next -- drivers/md/bcache/
>>
>> does not show it. It seems linux-block/for-next does not contain it?
>> Which branch should i use?
> 
> This is one of the pitfalls of selectively taking a bunch of changes
> back into an older kernel series, especially from development trees.
> linux-block/for-next is guaranteed to contain all the changes needed to
> take the linux-next tree into complete state, but not necessarily to be
> based on a point in time on linux-next that captures all past changes.
> Similarly, there's no guarantee that current bcache code will work well
> on the 4.4 kernel without changes-- i.e. I am accepting changes that
> rely on recent changes in kernel facilities to compile, and I would
> accept changes that rely on recent changes in semantics to be correct.

Yes sure but that's no problem. I already backported them.

Stefan