From: Jonathan Tripathy <jonnyt-Nf8S+5hNwl710XsdtD+oqA@public.gmane.org>
To: "linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Expected Behavior
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:15:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <503F132E.6060305@abpni.co.uk> (raw)
Hi There,
On my WIndows DomU (Xen VM) which is running on a LV which is using
bcache (against two SSD in MDRAID1 and a MD-RAID10 spindle array), I ran
an IOMeter test for about 2 hours (with 30 workers and a io depth of
256). This was a very heavy workload (Got an average iops of about
6.5k). After I stopped the test, I then went back to fio on my Linux Xen
Host (Dom0). The random write performance isn't as good as it was before
I started the IOMeter test. It used to be about 25k and now showed about
7k iops. I assumed that maybe this was due to the fact that bcache was
writing out dirty data to the spindles so the SSD was busy.
However, this morning, after the spindles have calmed down, performance
of fio is still not great (still about 7k).
Is there something wrong here? What is expected behavior?
Thanks
next reply other threads:[~2012-08-30 7:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-30 7:15 Jonathan Tripathy [this message]
[not found] ` <503F132E.6060305-Nf8S+5hNwl710XsdtD+oqA@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-30 7:21 ` Expected Behavior Jonathan Tripathy
[not found] ` <503F147A.10101-Nf8S+5hNwl710XsdtD+oqA@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-30 7:26 ` Jonathan Tripathy
[not found] ` <503F15A9.5020000-Nf8S+5hNwl710XsdtD+oqA@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-30 7:34 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2012-08-30 12:18 ` Jonathan Tripathy
[not found] ` <239802233aa1dabc37f60b293d2941c9-Nf8S+5hNwl710XsdtD+oqA@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-30 21:28 ` Kent Overstreet
[not found] ` <20120830212841.GB14247-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-30 22:59 ` Jonathan Tripathy
[not found] ` <503FF05B.1040506-Nf8S+5hNwl710XsdtD+oqA@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-31 1:10 ` Kent Overstreet
2012-08-31 3:47 ` James Harper
[not found] ` <6035A0D088A63A46850C3988ED045A4B29A7D49D-mzsoxcrO4/2UD0RQwgcqbDSf8X3wrgjD@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-31 12:36 ` Jonathan Tripathy
[not found] ` <a7955ba43dfd9792245545eeb8c54e55-Nf8S+5hNwl710XsdtD+oqA@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-31 12:41 ` Jonathan Tripathy
[not found] ` <151f74230aeb6825d9b8b633881d5e6c-Nf8S+5hNwl710XsdtD+oqA@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-01 12:47 ` Jonathan Tripathy
[not found] ` <504203F8.4000302-Nf8S+5hNwl710XsdtD+oqA@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-03 0:37 ` Kent Overstreet
[not found] ` <20120903003750.GA20060-jC9Py7bek1znysI04z7BkA@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-03 8:30 ` Jonathan Tripathy
[not found] ` <fd31f46503030cb2f09c50453971f618-Nf8S+5hNwl710XsdtD+oqA@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-04 3:46 ` Kent Overstreet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=503F132E.6060305@abpni.co.uk \
--to=jonnyt-nf8s+5hnwl710xsdtd+oqa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).