From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pierre Beck Subject: Re: Loosing transactions Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 21:05:31 +0100 Message-ID: <51097D0A.6040204@pierre-beck.de> References: <51004490.704@pierre-beck.de> <20130124233559.GO26407@google.com> <51068F01.9060000@pierre-beck.de> <20130129190133.GL26407@google.com> <20130129190942.GM26407@google.com> <51082E02.7000908@pierre-beck.de> <20130130190220.GS26407@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130130190220.GS26407-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-bcache-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Kent Overstreet Cc: linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org Am 30.01.2013 20:02, schrieb Kent Overstreet: > That delay is a parameter - /sys/fs/bcache//journal_delay_ms. > Can you set it to 0 and see what happens? It might reduce the number of > missing transactions, eliminate the missing transactions... or have no > effect at all. > Test passed. Double-checked. No transactions lost. I really want to see bcache in mainline kernel soon. It's such a great addition for storage arrays. Let's polish it up. When you have a fix, I'll test a full storage stack on it. Ext4 alone is boring :-) Greetings, Pierre Beck