From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG Subject: Re: kernel 3.10 + applied bcache patches unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:31:43 +0200 Message-ID: <51DFBEEF.3020106@profihost.ag> References: <51D542EB.7070404@profihost.ag> <51D56066.80106@profihost.ag> <20130712014017.GE17799@kmo-pixel> <51DF9E21.3060601@profihost.ag> <20130712081901.GB8339@kmo-pixel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130712081901.GB8339@kmo-pixel> Sender: linux-bcache-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Kent Overstreet Cc: linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org Am 12.07.2013 10:19, schrieb Kent Overstreet: > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 08:11:45AM +0200, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote: >> Am 12.07.2013 03:40, schrieb Kent Overstreet: >>> On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 01:45:42PM +0200, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote: >>>> fix is this one: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=LBFJRvEt >>> >>> Oh I see, the patch that introduced this is an old version of the patch >>> - the bcache-for-3.11 had this fixed, and I forgot to update that >>> branch. Thanks, I'll apply it there. >> >> thanks - which commit id is the fix in? i can't find it. > > The patch that introduced it wasn't ever destined for 3.10 anyways, and > I just deleted the bcache/bcache-3.9 branches because they'd gotten out > of sync and weren't getting updated with bcache-dev/bcache-for-3.11. Thanks! > So just stick with bcache-for-3.10, I just backported all the important > bugfixes to it - I'll be sending that stuff to Greg K-H for 3.10.1 in > the next couple days too. Thanks! Stefan