From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rolf Fokkens Subject: Re: [RFC] bcache-status Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 22:36:11 +0200 Message-ID: <521BBC3B.9010003@rolffokkens.nl> References: <521A55D4.20908@rolffokkens.nl> <521A6B92.60001@rolffokkens.nl> <20130826163055.GB4780@blackbox.djwong.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130826163055.GB4780-yuuUpGxbzT9UbpRmUfBrXUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-bcache-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org On 08/26/2013 06:30 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=999690#c12 > > I have a few questions/remarks: > - Is the python3 dependency really needed? I changed it to ordinary > python(2) and it runs fine I think. > Not required; I'm merely writing new scripts in python3. (At least when I can > find py3 libraries...) I didn't write anything py3-specific, as far as I know. Would you consider putting python in the header instead of python3? Having python3 in the heading adds the requirement to install python3, and I think python2 is (still) more standard. For Fedora 20 I think it is anyway, which means I have to patch it everytime I want to package it. > For now, there's: https://gist.github.com/djwong/6343451 in which I've merged > all the changes made by the two people who (thank you both!) provided > modifications. > > Yeah, I fixed that before posting the gist. :) --D Thanks, I'll update the package!