public inbox for linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zachary Palmer <zep_bcache-J5qI5MFTcs8@public.gmane.org>
To: Gabriel de Perthuis <g2p.code-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: Suspend and Hibernation Bugs
Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 19:13:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5223CA04.4010607@bahj.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5223999F.2050508-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

Interesting; it does indeed have a stale header of some kind:

     zpalmer@thirtyseven:~$ sudo blkid /dev/sda7
     /dev/sda7: UUID="b56e8430-2594-436a-9fba-b91617cdaa5e" 
TYPE="crypto_LUKS"
     zpalmer@thirtyseven:~$ sudo /sbin/wipefs /dev/sda7
     offset               type
----------------------------------------------------------------
     0x0                  crypto_LUKS   [crypto]
                         UUID: b56e8430-2594-436a-9fba-b91617cdaa5e

But /dev/sda7 is a bcache backing volume.

     zpalmer@thirtyseven:~$ sudo probe-bcache /dev/sda7
     4b6ead1d-3341-407c-9e16-dd9e639268e4: UUID="" TYPE="bcache"

Doesn't bcache put its superblock in the first part of the block 
device?  How is it possible that the device looks like a bcache backing 
volume and a LUKS encrypted volume at the same time?  (For the record, I 
know that the LUKS volume identified above is the stale one; when I used 
LVM to move everything around, I created a fresh LUKS encrypted volume 
which has a different UUID than the old one shown above.)

Thanks,

Zach

p.s.: Regarding the hibernation issue, I believe that a related bug has 
already been reported to the Debian crew, who have sent at least some of 
the information upstream to kernel development (see 
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=715019).  I've added my 
own information to that bug report, of course.  If I can provide any 
information that would be of assistance, please let me know.
>> Hello there. I'm not sure if this is the appropriate venue, so please
>> let me know if this information should be somewhere else. I have
>> configured a Debian 7.0 installation on a Dell Inspiron 17R SE laptop
>> to use a bcache root device. The previous known working configuration
>> for the laptop was:
>>
>>      /dev/sda (1TB HDD)
>>          ...
>>          /dev/sda7 (used as LUKS encrypted volume)
>>              /dev/mapper/sda7_crypt (used as LVM PV)
>>                  /dev/vg0/home
>>                  /dev/vg0/root
>>                  ...
>>          /dev/sda8 (used as ext3 /boot)
>>
>> The new configuration is
>>
>>      /dev/sda (1TB HDD)
>>          ...
>>          /dev/sda7 (used as bcache backing device)
>>              /dev/bcache0 (used as LUKS encrypted volume)
>>                  /dev/mapper/bcache_crypt (used as LVM PV)
>>                      /dev/vg0/home
>>                      /dev/vg0/root
>>                      ...
>>          /dev/sda8 (used as ext3 /boot)
>>      /dev/sdb (32GB SSD)
>>          ...
>>          /dev/sdb3 (used as bcache caching device)
>>
>> In order to get things booting, I also:
>>
>>      * Installed a Linux 3.10 kernel from wheezy-backports (3.10-0.bpo.2-686-pae)
>>      * Obtained a copy of the bcache-tools source from the git repo and compiled it
>>      * Constructed a Debian package for bcache-tools using checkinstall
>>      * Because udev recognition wasn't enough at boot time, added a script
>>        /etc/initramfs-tools/scripts/init-premount/z-bcache which looks like this:
> Just addressing the udev part; could you check with wipefs (nondestructive with no flags)
> that /dev/sda7 doesn't have an old non-bcache superblock?
>
> There's been a transitional period when udev rules were stricter than what make-bcache
> created, which will be fixed with the patch at https://github.com/g2p/bcache-tools/commits.
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-09-01 23:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-01 18:10 Suspend and Hibernation Bugs Zachary Palmer
     [not found] ` <52238303.6040509-J5qI5MFTcs8@public.gmane.org>
2013-09-01 19:46   ` Gabriel de Perthuis
     [not found]     ` <5223999F.2050508-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2013-09-01 23:13       ` Zachary Palmer [this message]
     [not found]         ` <5223CA04.4010607-J5qI5MFTcs8@public.gmane.org>
2013-09-02  9:58           ` Gabriel de Perthuis
2013-09-02 16:37   ` Darrick J. Wong
     [not found]     ` <20130902163743.GA14878-yuuUpGxbzT9UbpRmUfBrXUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
2013-09-02 20:07       ` Zachary Palmer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5223CA04.4010607@bahj.com \
    --to=zep_bcache-j5qi5mftcs8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=g2p.code-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox