From: Zachary Palmer <zep_bcache-J5qI5MFTcs8@public.gmane.org>
To: Gabriel de Perthuis <g2p.code-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: Suspend and Hibernation Bugs
Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 19:13:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5223CA04.4010607@bahj.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5223999F.2050508-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Interesting; it does indeed have a stale header of some kind:
zpalmer@thirtyseven:~$ sudo blkid /dev/sda7
/dev/sda7: UUID="b56e8430-2594-436a-9fba-b91617cdaa5e"
TYPE="crypto_LUKS"
zpalmer@thirtyseven:~$ sudo /sbin/wipefs /dev/sda7
offset type
----------------------------------------------------------------
0x0 crypto_LUKS [crypto]
UUID: b56e8430-2594-436a-9fba-b91617cdaa5e
But /dev/sda7 is a bcache backing volume.
zpalmer@thirtyseven:~$ sudo probe-bcache /dev/sda7
4b6ead1d-3341-407c-9e16-dd9e639268e4: UUID="" TYPE="bcache"
Doesn't bcache put its superblock in the first part of the block
device? How is it possible that the device looks like a bcache backing
volume and a LUKS encrypted volume at the same time? (For the record, I
know that the LUKS volume identified above is the stale one; when I used
LVM to move everything around, I created a fresh LUKS encrypted volume
which has a different UUID than the old one shown above.)
Thanks,
Zach
p.s.: Regarding the hibernation issue, I believe that a related bug has
already been reported to the Debian crew, who have sent at least some of
the information upstream to kernel development (see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=715019). I've added my
own information to that bug report, of course. If I can provide any
information that would be of assistance, please let me know.
>> Hello there. I'm not sure if this is the appropriate venue, so please
>> let me know if this information should be somewhere else. I have
>> configured a Debian 7.0 installation on a Dell Inspiron 17R SE laptop
>> to use a bcache root device. The previous known working configuration
>> for the laptop was:
>>
>> /dev/sda (1TB HDD)
>> ...
>> /dev/sda7 (used as LUKS encrypted volume)
>> /dev/mapper/sda7_crypt (used as LVM PV)
>> /dev/vg0/home
>> /dev/vg0/root
>> ...
>> /dev/sda8 (used as ext3 /boot)
>>
>> The new configuration is
>>
>> /dev/sda (1TB HDD)
>> ...
>> /dev/sda7 (used as bcache backing device)
>> /dev/bcache0 (used as LUKS encrypted volume)
>> /dev/mapper/bcache_crypt (used as LVM PV)
>> /dev/vg0/home
>> /dev/vg0/root
>> ...
>> /dev/sda8 (used as ext3 /boot)
>> /dev/sdb (32GB SSD)
>> ...
>> /dev/sdb3 (used as bcache caching device)
>>
>> In order to get things booting, I also:
>>
>> * Installed a Linux 3.10 kernel from wheezy-backports (3.10-0.bpo.2-686-pae)
>> * Obtained a copy of the bcache-tools source from the git repo and compiled it
>> * Constructed a Debian package for bcache-tools using checkinstall
>> * Because udev recognition wasn't enough at boot time, added a script
>> /etc/initramfs-tools/scripts/init-premount/z-bcache which looks like this:
> Just addressing the udev part; could you check with wipefs (nondestructive with no flags)
> that /dev/sda7 doesn't have an old non-bcache superblock?
>
> There's been a transitional period when udev rules were stricter than what make-bcache
> created, which will be fixed with the patch at https://github.com/g2p/bcache-tools/commits.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-01 23:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-01 18:10 Suspend and Hibernation Bugs Zachary Palmer
[not found] ` <52238303.6040509-J5qI5MFTcs8@public.gmane.org>
2013-09-01 19:46 ` Gabriel de Perthuis
[not found] ` <5223999F.2050508-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2013-09-01 23:13 ` Zachary Palmer [this message]
[not found] ` <5223CA04.4010607-J5qI5MFTcs8@public.gmane.org>
2013-09-02 9:58 ` Gabriel de Perthuis
2013-09-02 16:37 ` Darrick J. Wong
[not found] ` <20130902163743.GA14878-yuuUpGxbzT9UbpRmUfBrXUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
2013-09-02 20:07 ` Zachary Palmer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5223CA04.4010607@bahj.com \
--to=zep_bcache-j5qi5mftcs8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=g2p.code-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox