From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rolf Fokkens Subject: Re: bcache-tools package for Fedora / status probe-bcache Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 08:53:59 +0200 Message-ID: <52282A87.4000801@rolffokkens.nl> References: <521A55D4.20908@rolffokkens.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <521A55D4.20908-6w2rdlBuEQTpMFipWq+H6g@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-bcache-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org Hi, Packaging is progressing well, an initial package is available: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bcache-tools-0-0.9.20130827git.fc20 probe-bcache is part of this package, but util-linux will obsolete this shortly: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001120#c13 Actually the blkid utility in util-linux will do a more thorough job on identifying bcache, e.g. by also checking the csum. Having blkid identify bcache also simplifies the bcache udev rules. So now I'm wondering: are there any particular reasons to keep probe-bcache part of the package, or will it really be obsolete? Rolf On 08/25/2013 09:07 PM, Rolf Fokkens wrote: > Hi! > > To allow Fedora users to benefit from bcache I'm currently packaging > bcache-tools for Fedora. > > See also: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=999690 > > Any suggestions or other feedback is welcome. Whenever I run into > something relevant, I'll share it with the mail list. > > Rolf Fokkens >