From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Zachary Palmer Subject: Re: Data corruption with bcache in 3.11 Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 16:45:38 -0400 Message-ID: <523CB3F2.90809@bahj.com> References: <20130920023501.GJ17891@kmo-pixel> <523BF3EB.7050709@rolffokkens.nl> <523CA2FF.4090102@rolffokkens.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <523CA2FF.4090102-6w2rdlBuEQTpMFipWq+H6g@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-bcache-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org Cc: Kent Overstreet , linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org On 09/20/2013 09:44 AM, Kent Overstreet wrote: > If you weren't seeing it before, don't worry about it. Normal setups > with the usual 4k block size won't ever see this. Fascinating. That might have been my problem; my block size is currently 512. (Is that ill-advised?) I'm currently running a kernel built from the 3.11 corruption fix branch and I have no problems so far. I'll report back in a few days; that's how long it usually took to start corrupting things and segfaulting the world. :) Thanks, Zach