From: Zachary Palmer <zep_bcache-J5qI5MFTcs8@public.gmane.org>
To: linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: Stopping a bcache device during shutdown
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 11:56:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <526D37C2.4080300@bahj.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <526D32C9.1070306-6w2rdlBuEQTpMFipWq+H6g@public.gmane.org>
Just to add a little bit to this discussion, I think I'm experiencing a
similar issue. I'm using bcache to improve my laptop's I/O
performance. My configuration is, using the syntax you used,
RootFS->LVM->dm-crypt->bcache(bcache0)->(sda7)
I get pretty much the same sort of shutdown messages using the stock
Linux 3.11.5 from kernel.org on my Debian Wheezy installation.
In my case, I'm getting this message with bcache immediately over a raw
disk (with a partition on an SSD acting as the cache). I don't have the
spare hardware to test things out, but I'm guessing that this happens
whenever LVM is anywhere on the stack above bcache.
It seems probable to me that this bug is preventing my laptop from
hibernating. :( I can still put it to sleep. The hibernation process
will start correctly, but things don't come back correctly when I try to
restore: I just get fscking on my root partition, which leads me to
believe that things weren't closed up properly. (To be fair, this might
also just be a kernel regression, since my Inspiron 17R SE laptop was
running 3.10 from Debian beforehand and is running 3.11.5 from
kernel.org now.)
Just wanted to throw in the extra data. :)
Cheers,
Zach
> Hi,
>
> My system has the following block device stack:
> RootFS->LVM->bcache(bcache0)->RAID5(md1)->(sda2, sdb2, sdc2)
>
> During shutdown on Fedora I noticed the following on console:
>
> [ 137.036846] dracut Warning: Unmounted /oldroot.
> [ 137.103139] dracut: Disassembling device-mapper devices
> [ 137.147160] dracut: Waiting for mdraid devices to be clean.
> [ 137.158556] dracut: Disassembling mdraid devices.
> mdadm: Cannot get exclusive access to /dev/md1:Perhaps a running
> process, mounted filesystem or active volume group?
> [ 138.247044] bcache: bcache_reboot() Stopping all devices:
> [ 140.247073] bcache: bcache_reboot() Timeout waiting for devices to
> be closed
> [ 140.250295] Unregister pv shared memory for cpu 0
> [ 140.253139] kvm: exiting hardware virtualization
>
> So apparently bcache is (b)locking /dev/md1 during shutdown. In an
> attempt to solve this, I added a "echo 1 >
> /sys/block/bcache0/bcache/stop":
>
> [ 137.036846] dracut Warning: Unmounted /oldroot.
> [ 137.076580] dracut: Stopping bcache devices
> STOP /sys/block/bcache0/bcache/stop
> [ 137.103139] dracut: Disassembling device-mapper devices
> [ 137.147160] dracut: Waiting for mdraid devices to be clean.
> [ 137.158556] dracut: Disassembling mdraid devices.
> mdadm: Cannot get exclusive access to /dev/md1:Perhaps a running
> process, mounted filesystem or active volume group?
> mdadm: Cannot get exclusive access to /dev/md1:Perhaps a running
> process, mounted filesystem or active volume group?
> mdadm: Cannot get exclusive access to /dev/md1:Perhaps a running
> process, mounted filesystem or active volume group?
> [ 137.200086] dracut: Stopping bcache cache sets
> STOP /sys/fs/bcache/408c0554-9752-4126-916d-5c5fe32037d2/stop
> Rebooting.
> [ 138.247044] bcache: bcache_reboot() Stopping all devices:
> [ 140.247073] bcache: bcache_reboot() Timeout waiting for devices to
> be closed
> [ 140.250295] Unregister pv shared memory for cpu 0
>
> The 1st STOP... line is the result of a debugging "echo .." command:
>
> for stop in /sys/block/bcache[0-9]*/bcache/stop; do
> [ -f "$stop" ] || continue
> echo 1 > "$stop"
> echo STOP $stop
> done
>
>
> The second STOP does the same for the cache set, but that's not the
> issue now.
>
> From both the documentation and testing I understand that the first
> STOP should mark the bcache0 device for stop as soon as it's no longer
> used, in this case by LVM. So when LVM (device mapper devices) is
> disassembled, bcache should actually stop the bcache0 device. But his
> apparently doesn't happen. I did a test with almost the same config,
> but without bcache between LVM and RAID5, in that case all works fine.
> So it looks like bcache is the cause.
>
> So I may be misunderstanding the way "echo 1 >
> /sys/block/bcache0/bcache/stop" works. Are there any suggestions for
> my where to look further?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rolf
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-bcache" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-27 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-27 15:35 Stopping a bcache device during shutdown Rolf Fokkens
[not found] ` <526D32C9.1070306-6w2rdlBuEQTpMFipWq+H6g@public.gmane.org>
2013-10-27 15:56 ` Zachary Palmer [this message]
[not found] ` <526D37C2.4080300-J5qI5MFTcs8@public.gmane.org>
2013-11-04 3:41 ` bcache and laptop hibernation working under Linux 3.11.5 Zachary Palmer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=526D37C2.4080300@bahj.com \
--to=zep_bcache-j5qi5mftcs8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox