linux-bcache.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com>
To: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>, Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Cc: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Issue (as expected) when upgrading from 3.12 to 3.13.7
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 14:08:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53380959.9030004@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140330114747.GA15353@sucs.org>

On 03/30/2014 01:47 PM, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 12:53:12PM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote:
>>
>> As I was expecting I'm getting new issues with bcache after upgrading my
>> kernel:
>>
>> [Mar30 12:24] INFO: task bcache_writebac:155 blocked for more than 120
>> seconds.
>> [  +0.000007]       Not tainted 3.13.7-1-ARCH #1
>> [  +0.000002] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs"
>> disables this message.
>> [  +0.000003] bcache_writebac D 0000000000000000     0   155      2
>> 0x00000000
>> [  +0.000006]  ffff8804049c5eb8 0000000000000046 ffff880405816c00
>> ffff8804049c5fd8
>> [  +0.000005]  0000000000014440 0000000000014440 ffff880405816c00
>> ffff8804049c5e38
>> [  +0.000004]  ffffffff810925fa 24448b48e0d83524 fa83ffffee31e918
>> 0000000000000046
>> [  +0.000004] Call Trace:
>> [  +0.000010]  [<ffffffff810925fa>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x1fa/0x2c0
>> [  +0.000006]  [<ffffffff81092712>] ? default_wake_function+0x12/0x20
>> [  +0.000005]  [<ffffffff810a2538>] ? __wake_up_common+0x58/0x90
>> [  +0.000023]  [<ffffffffa03c7470>] ? read_dirty_endio+0x60/0x60 [bcache]
>> [  +0.000005]  [<ffffffff81516239>] schedule+0x29/0x70
>> [  +0.000006]  [<ffffffff8108358d>] kthread+0xad/0xf0
>> [  +0.000005]  [<ffffffff810834e0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x180/0x180
>> [  +0.000005]  [<ffffffff81521abc>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
>> [  +0.000005]  [<ffffffff810834e0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x180/0x180
>>
>> That's just sad to see how unstable was/is bcache sub system and I still
>> don't understand why it was not marked as experimental.
>>
>> 3.12 was/is buggy when used with writeback mode, and I just had to live
>> with cache-through. I tried to get some helps (and others too) but no
>> answers.
>>
>> I read there were issue with 3.13, so I delayed my kernel upgrade as far
>> I could due to this. I was hoping that issues were fixed in 3.13.x
>> stable tree but apparently not.
>>
>> Hopefully this one will not be ignored.
> 
> Francis - I've found it helps if you add all the relevant addresses
> mentioned in https://www.kernel.org/doc/linux/MAINTAINERS . For this
> mail I'm going to explicitly CC Kent to help this get noticed.
> Additionally do you also see this problem with 3.14?
> 

Sorry 3.14 is not available yet on my distro.

Thanks

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-30 12:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-30 10:53 Issue (as expected) when upgrading from 3.12 to 3.13.7 Francis Moreau
2014-03-30 11:47 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2014-03-30 12:08   ` Francis Moreau [this message]
2014-03-30 13:04     ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2014-03-30 13:24       ` Francis Moreau
2014-04-03  9:56   ` Francis Moreau
2014-03-31  3:20 ` Peter Kieser
2014-04-01  6:51   ` Francis Moreau
2014-04-03 10:02 ` Vivek Dasmohapatra
2014-04-03 16:18   ` Francis Moreau
2014-04-03 16:21     ` Vivek Dasmohapatra
2014-04-03 20:39       ` Sam Fulcomer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53380959.9030004@gmail.com \
    --to=francis.moro@gmail.com \
    --cc=kmo@daterainc.com \
    --cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sitsofe@yahoo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).