On 2014-05-15 1:02 AM, Francis Moreau wrote:
> Eventually I would suggest to mark bcache as an experimental thing since
> it's really not ready for production, just take a look at the bcache
> mailing list to see why. At least people won't be disappointed when
> they'll use bcache and see ton of koops.

I'm going to second this request to mark bcache as experimental. XFS 
performance has been stunted (almost DoS condition) since 3.10.4, btrfs 
doesn't currently work and Kent is leaving it up to the btrfs team to 
fix the bugs in either bcache or btrfs. Multiple deadlocks/interruptible 
sleeps and corruption.

-Peter