From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eddie Chapman <eddie@ehuk.net>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] bcache changes for 3.17
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 16:37:32 +0100
Message-ID: <5409D8BC.7030003@ehuk.net>
References: <20140805043346.GF541@moria.home.lan> <53E10D48.1010700@kernel.dk> <53E7251B.3080305@kieser.ca> <540966BA.9030106@gmail.com> <5409C5FC.6020406@kernel.dk>
Reply-To: eddie@ehuk.net, Eddie Chapman <eddie@ehuk.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <stable-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <5409C5FC.6020406@kernel.dk>
Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com>, Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Cc: Peter Kieser <peter@kieser.ca>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org

On 05/09/14 15:17, Jens Axboe wrote:
> (from oldest to newest). And that's just from 3.16 to 3.17-rc3, going
> all the way back to 3.10 would be a lot of work. If there's anyone that
> cares about bcache on stable kernels (and actually use it), now would be
> a good time to pipe up.

Just "piping up" as I care about bcache and actually use it in 
production on 3.10! Shame I don't have the knowledge to try and backport 
these though :-)

Eddie