From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG Subject: Re: Is bcache dead? Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 15:15:38 +0100 Message-ID: <5452480A.1020702@profihost.ag> References: <545229F8.8000502@profihost.ag> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-ph.de-nserver.de ([85.158.179.214]:53859 "EHLO mail-ph.de-nserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760140AbaJ3OPk (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Oct 2014 10:15:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-bcache-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org To: Kent Overstreet Cc: "linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org" Hi Kent, nice to hear you. No problem at all. I was just wondering that there was no single response to all the bcache_gc problems people have, Greets, Stefan Am 30.10.2014 um 15:14 schrieb Kent Overstreet: > no, I've just been severely overworked, and overstressed, to the point > that it might be time for a change of jobs - and unfortunately, there > still isn't anyone else who can step in. It's not fun being the single > point of failure. > > Sorry for going off the radar. Might be a good time to take some time > off and try and get some upstream work done. > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 5:07 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> this might be a bit aggressive - sorry for that. >> >> There are a lot of people having deadlocks with bcache_gc and there's no >> dev looking into this since month. >> >> Greets, >> Stefan