public inbox for linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Eddie Chapman <eddie@ehuk.net>
Cc: Coly Li <i@coly.li>,
	linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	bcache@lists.ewheeler.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] bcache: fixes and update for 4.14
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 13:31:36 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54b17f24-2e94-ab1a-6a35-130684504ddf@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47ffe60a-7f05-4193-1f98-f3e56e28e0b0@ehuk.net>

On 09/07/2017 12:51 PM, Eddie Chapman wrote:
> On 06/09/17 18:38, Coly Li wrote:
>> On 2017/9/6 下午11:46, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 09/06/2017 09:41 AM, Coly Li wrote:
>>>> On 2017/9/6 下午10:20, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Sep 06 2017, Coly Li wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Jens,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here are 12 patchs for bcache fixes and updates, most of them were posted
>>>>>> by Eric Wheeler in 4.13 merge window, but delayed due to lack of code
>>>>>> review.
>>>>>
>>>>> Next time, please send this _before_ the merge window opens. Not a huge
>>>>> problem for this series, since it has been posted numerous times in the
>>>>> past and already has good review coverage, but it really should have
>>>>> been in linux-next for a week or two before heading upstream.
>>>>>
>>>> Hi Jens,
>>>>
>>>> Copied, send patches _before_ merge window opens.
>>>>
>>>> But could you please to give me a hint, how can I find when a specific
>>>> merge window will open ? I search LKML, and see people send pull
>>>> requests for 4.14 merge window, but I don't see any announcement for
>>>> 4.14 merge window time slot.
>>>
>>> The merge window opens when Linus releases the previous kernel. So you
>>> have to try and keep track of when he expects to do that. That really
>>> isn't that difficult - Linus always cuts a release on Sundays. We always
>>> have 7 or 8 rc releases, so a good time to check is his mail on -rc6 or
>>> -rc7 release, that usually gives a good indication of when he expects to
>>> release the final.
>>>
>>> To keep things simple, if you always have things ready when -rc7 is
>>> released, then you are at least one week out from the merge window,
>>> possibly two if we end up doing an -rc8. That means you don't have to
>>> track anything, you know the exact date of when -rc7 is released since
>>> Linus's schedule is usually reliable.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Jens,
>>
>> Copied, I will follow the above rule in next cycle.
>>
>> And I just post the last patch
>> (0013-bcache-initialize-stripe_sectors_dirty-correctly-for.patch) to you
>> for 4.14 cycle.
>>
>> This patch is an important fix for bcache writeback rate calculation, it
>> is depended by another patch I sent to you
>> (0006-bcache-correct-cache_dirty_target-in-__update_writeb.patch),
>> please have it in 4.14.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
> 
> Hello Jens,
> 
> FWIW I'd like to support Coly by reporting that patches 0001, 0002, 0006 
> and 0013 (the last one mentioned above) have been tested by me on 2 
> production servers with a good deal of bcache activity for the last 6 
> weeks without any issues having arisen.
> 
> But this may not be much use to you to know, as these are running 
> vanilla kernel.org kernel 4.4.77.  Still, these 4 patches exactly as 
> Coly has sent them to you apply without any changes to the code, so I 
> guess it vouches for the code at least somewhat.

That's all good and fine, and it's better than no testing at all. But it
doesn't change the fact that anyone using bcache on -next would have
been using the changes for a while before release, instead of just one
or two people. Additionally, your base is drastically different than
mainline, since you're running a kernel that's a year and a half old.

Next time I'm not adding anything post merge window open, unless it's
addressing a problem that was added in the merge window.

-- 
Jens Axboe

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-07 19:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-06  6:25 [PATCH 00/13] bcache: fixes and update for 4.14 Coly Li
2017-09-06  6:25 ` [PATCH 01/12] bcache: Fix leak of bdev reference Coly Li
2017-09-06  6:25 ` [PATCH 02/12] bcache: fix sequential large write IO bypass Coly Li
2017-09-06  6:25 ` [PATCH 03/12] bcache: do not subtract sectors_to_gc for bypassed IO Coly Li
2017-09-06  6:25 ` [PATCH 04/12] bcache: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API Coly Li
2017-09-26  4:38   ` Michael Lyle
2017-09-26  6:39     ` 박병철/선임연구원/SW Platform(연)AOT팀(byungchul.park@lge.com)
2017-09-26  7:09       ` Coly Li
2017-09-26  7:15         ` 박병철/선임연구원/SW Platform(연)AOT팀(byungchul.park@lge.com)
2017-09-26  7:22           ` Coly Li
2017-09-26  7:08     ` Coly Li
2017-09-26  7:16       ` 박병철/선임연구원/SW Platform(연)AOT팀(byungchul.park@lge.com)
2017-09-26  7:24         ` Coly Li
2017-09-26  7:46     ` Coly Li
2017-09-26 19:55       ` Michael Lyle
2017-09-06  6:25 ` [PATCH 05/12] bcache: gc does not work when triggering by manual command Coly Li
2017-09-06  6:25 ` [PATCH 06/12] bcache: correct cache_dirty_target in __update_writeback_rate() Coly Li
2017-09-06  6:25 ` [PATCH 07/12] bcache: Correct return value for sysfs attach errors Coly Li
2017-09-06  6:25 ` [PATCH 08/12] bcache: increase the number of open buckets Coly Li
2017-09-06  6:25 ` [PATCH 09/12] bcache: fix for gc and write-back race Coly Li
2017-09-06  6:26 ` [PATCH 10/12] bcache: silence static checker warning Coly Li
2017-09-06  6:26 ` [PATCH 11/12] bcache: Update continue_at() documentation Coly Li
2017-09-06  6:26 ` [PATCH 12/12] bcache: fix bch_hprint crash and improve output Coly Li
2017-09-06 14:20 ` [PATCH 00/13] bcache: fixes and update for 4.14 Jens Axboe
2017-09-06 15:41   ` Coly Li
2017-09-06 15:46     ` Jens Axboe
2017-09-06 17:38       ` Coly Li
2017-09-07 18:51         ` Eddie Chapman
2017-09-07 19:31           ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2017-09-07 19:01         ` Eddie Chapman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54b17f24-2e94-ab1a-6a35-130684504ddf@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bcache@lists.ewheeler.net \
    --cc=eddie@ehuk.net \
    --cc=i@coly.li \
    --cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox