public inbox for linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "A. James Lewis" <james@fsck.co.uk>
To: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org
Subject: layering question.
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 17:20:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55C0E63F.2030007@fsck.co.uk> (raw)

Hi all...

I've heard rumours that layering bcache with other block device drivers 
might not be recommended... I wonder what the truth really is... perhaps 
someone can advise.

I was planning to use 2 SSD's... combined with 4 large spinning drives 
to create a large filesystem with BTRFS...  my questions are as follows.

1. Is there a way to use 2 SSD's directly, or would it be OK to use MD 
to stripe them?... then used the MD array as the cache device?

2. I would be using BTRFS, so would it be better to create 4 separate 
bcache devices each attached to the single cache device, and then use 
BTRFS to raid 4 bcache devices... obviously this would be more flexible, 
or would I need to make an MD raid of the 4 devices, and then use that 
to create a single bcache device and build a BTRFS filesystem on top of 
that.

Hope that's clear, any clarification would be appreciated...

Also, there's talk about a pending on-disk cache format change some time 
around 3.19, but no details... is this over with, or still pending?

James

             reply	other threads:[~2015-08-04 16:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-04 16:20 A. James Lewis [this message]
2015-08-04 17:01 ` layering question Jens-U. Mozdzen
2015-08-04 17:16   ` A. James Lewis
2015-08-05  6:56     ` Jens-U. Mozdzen
2015-08-05  6:28 ` Kai Krakow
2015-08-05  7:04   ` Jens-U. Mozdzen
2015-08-05 23:10     ` Kai Krakow
2015-08-06  0:54       ` A. James Lewis
2015-08-06 23:12         ` Kai Krakow
2015-08-07 12:43           ` Jens-U. Mozdzen
2015-08-07 14:38             ` A. James Lewis
2015-08-07 15:36               ` Jens-U. Mozdzen
2015-08-07 16:16                 ` A. James Lewis
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-08-07 16:24 Jens-U. Mozdzen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55C0E63F.2030007@fsck.co.uk \
    --to=james@fsck.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox