From: Vlad <vovan@vovan.nl>
To: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org
Subject: block size question
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 07:50:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <573C02B3.5010501@net.home> (raw)
Hallo,
What would be the optimal block size in case if physical block sizes
different for cache and backing devices? Can I use different block sizes
for cache and backing devices, like:
make-bcache --block 4k -B /dev/sdc
make-bcache --block 512 -C /dev/sda
I have a feeling that the block size should be the same and the biggest
block size should be used, but I'd appreciate any thoughts about that.
Thanks in advance,
Vlad.
next reply other threads:[~2016-05-18 5:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-18 5:50 Vlad [this message]
2016-05-18 7:11 ` block size question Killian De Volder
2016-05-18 14:14 ` Killian De Volder
2016-05-18 15:46 ` Killian De Volder
2016-05-18 16:24 ` Vlad
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=573C02B3.5010501@net.home \
--to=vovan@vovan.nl \
--cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).