From: Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org>
To: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, tang.junhui@zte.com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 01/10] bcache: exit bch_writeback_thread() with proper task state
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 09:08:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5cd9f028-366a-ba94-3bdf-0aefd5028c21@lyle.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180103140325.63175-2-colyli@suse.de>
On 01/03/2018 06:03 AM, Coly Li wrote:
> Kernel thread routine bch_writeback_thread() has the following code block,
>
> 452 set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> 453
> 454 if (kthread_should_stop())
> 455 return 0;
> 456
> 457 schedule();
> 458 continue;
>
> At line 452, its status is set to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, and at line 454 if
> kthread_should_stop() is true, a "return 0" at line 455 will to function
> kernel/kthread.c:kthread() and call do_exit().
>
> It is not good to enter do_exit() with task state TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, in
> following code path might_sleep() is called and a warning message is
> reported by __might_sleep(): "WARNING: do not call blocking ops when
> !TASK_RUNNING; state=1 set at [xxxx]".
>
> Indeed it does not hurt when kernel thread exits with TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE
> state, but this warning message scares users, makes them feel there might
> be something risky with bcache and hurt their data.
>
> In this patch, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE is set after kthread_should_stop(),
> so writeback kernel thread can exist and enter do_exit() with
> TASK_RUNNING state. Warning message from might_sleep() is removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-03 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-03 14:03 [PATCH v1 00/10] cache device failure handling improvement Coly Li
2018-01-03 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 01/10] bcache: exit bch_writeback_thread() with proper task state Coly Li
2018-01-03 17:08 ` Michael Lyle [this message]
2018-01-05 17:05 ` Coly Li
2018-01-05 17:09 ` Michael Lyle
2018-01-08 7:09 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-08 13:50 ` Coly Li
2018-01-03 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 02/10] bcache: set task properly in allocator_wait() Coly Li
2018-01-03 17:09 ` Michael Lyle
2018-01-05 17:11 ` Coly Li
2018-01-08 7:10 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-03 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 03/10] bcache: reduce cache_set devices iteration by devices_max_used Coly Li
2018-01-03 17:11 ` Michael Lyle
2018-01-08 7:12 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-03 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 04/10] bcache: fix cached_dev->count usage for bch_cache_set_error() Coly Li
2018-01-08 7:16 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-03 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 05/10] bcache: stop dc->writeback_rate_update if cache set is stopping Coly Li
2018-01-08 7:22 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-08 16:01 ` Coly Li
2018-01-03 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 06/10] bcache: stop dc->writeback_rate_update, dc->writeback_thread earlier Coly Li
2018-01-08 7:25 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-03 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 07/10] bcache: set error_limit correctly Coly Li
2018-01-08 7:26 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-03 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 08/10] bcache: fix misleading error message in bch_count_io_errors() Coly Li
2018-01-03 17:14 ` Michael Lyle
2018-01-08 7:27 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-03 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 09/10] bcache: add io_disable to struct cache_set Coly Li
2018-01-08 7:30 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-03 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 10/10] bcache: stop all attached bcache devices for a retired cache set Coly Li
2018-01-08 7:31 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-03 17:07 ` [PATCH v1 00/10] cache device failure handling improvement Michael Lyle
2018-01-04 2:20 ` Coly Li
2018-01-04 17:46 ` Michael Lyle
2018-01-05 4:04 ` Coly Li
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-01-03 18:30 [PATCH v1 01/10] bcache: exit bch_writeback_thread() with proper task state tang.junhui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5cd9f028-366a-ba94-3bdf-0aefd5028c21@lyle.org \
--to=mlyle@lyle.org \
--cc=colyli@suse.de \
--cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tang.junhui@zte.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox