From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [PATCH] md: Convert timers to use timer_setup() Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 21:12:00 -0600 Message-ID: References: <20171017000148.GA102867@beast> <390e7ce2-fda1-ad11-6c96-0ea44615c845@lyle.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Kees Cook Cc: Michael Lyle , Shaohua Li , Kent Overstreet , Alasdair Kergon , Mike Snitzer , dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, LKML List-Id: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org > On Oct 18, 2017, at 9:06 PM, Kees Cook wrote: >=20 >> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 8:06 PM, Michael Lyle wrote: >>> On 10/16/2017 05:01 PM, Kees Cook wrote: >>> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer= to >>> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_time= r() >>> to pass the timer pointer explicitly. >>>=20 >>> Cc: Kent Overstreet >>> Cc: Shaohua Li >>> Cc: Alasdair Kergon >>> Cc: Mike Snitzer >>> Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com >>> Cc: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org >>> Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org >>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook >>=20 >> This looks good to me-- I'm fine with Jens or someone else picking this >> up directly, or would take a bcache-specific one to apply to my tree. >>=20 >> Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle >=20 > Jens, can you pick this up, or would you prefer I split it up? I can pick it up, but I don=E2=80=99t think I was ever cc=E2=80=99ed on the original.