Re: [axboe-block:for-next] [block] 1122c0c1cc: aim7.jobs-per-min 22.6% improvement

[Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>]

On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 10:10:49AM +0800, Oliver Sang wrote:
> I'm not sure I understand this test request. as in title, we see a good
> improvement of aim7 for 1122c0c1cc, and we didn't observe other issues for
> this commit.

The improvement suggests we are not sending cache flushes when we should
send them, or at least just handle them in md.

> do you mean this improvement is not expected or exposes some problems instead?
> then by below patch, should the performance back to the level of parent of
> 1122c0c1cc?
> 
> sure! it's our great pleasure to test your patches. I noticed there are
> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240625110603.50885-2-hch@lst.de/
> which includes "[PATCH 1/7] md: set md-specific flags for all queue limits"
> [2]
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240625145955.115252-2-hch@lst.de/
> which includes "[PATCH 1/8] md: set md-specific flags for all queue limits"
> 
> which one you suggest us to test?
> do we only need to apply the first patch "md: set md-specific flags for all queue limits"
> upon 1122c0c1cc?
> then is the expectation the performance back to parent of 1122c0c1cc?

Either just the patch in reply or the entire [2] series would be fine.

Thanks!