From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Coly Li <colyli@fnnas.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, Shida Zhang <zhangshida@kylinos.cn>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "bcache: fix improper use of bi_end_io"
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 08:25:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aWZx3R_02TDgMCPU@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aWZwlE0JdtEvhh9g@studio.local>
On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 12:22:56AM +0800, Coly Li wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 12:07:54AM +0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 02:09:39PM +0800, colyli@fnnas.com wrote:
> > > From: Coly Li <colyli@fnnas.com>
> > >
> > > This reverts commit 53280e398471f0bddbb17b798a63d41264651325.
> > >
> > > The above commit tries to address the race in bio chain handling,
> > > but it seems in detached_dev_end_io() simply using bio_endio() to
> > > replace bio->bi_end_io() may introduce potential regression.
> > >
> > > This patch revert the commit, let's wait for better fix from Shida.
> >
> > That's a pretty vague commit message for reverting a clear API
> > violation that has caused trouble. What is the story here?
> >
>
> The discussion happens in stable mailing list. Also I admitted my fault.
> Though I didn't ack commit 53280e398471 ("bcache: fix improper use of
> bi_end_io"), I read it and overlooked the bio_endio() duplicated entry
> issue.
Please try to document the rationale in the commit logs, the current
one was extremely vague.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-13 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-13 6:09 [PATCH] Revert "bcache: fix improper use of bi_end_io" colyli
2026-01-13 8:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-13 8:30 ` Kent Overstreet
2026-01-13 8:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-13 8:39 ` Kent Overstreet
2026-01-13 8:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-13 9:27 ` Kent Overstreet
2026-01-13 15:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-13 15:30 ` Kent Overstreet
2026-01-13 16:18 ` Coly Li
2026-01-13 16:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-13 16:34 ` Kent Overstreet
2026-01-19 9:51 ` Daniel Wagner
2026-01-19 10:18 ` Kent Overstreet
2026-01-19 10:34 ` Daniel Wagner
2026-01-19 15:57 ` Daniel Wagner
2026-01-13 16:22 ` Coly Li
2026-01-13 16:25 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aWZx3R_02TDgMCPU@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=colyli@fnnas.com \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zhangshida@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox