From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/14] bcache: explicitly make cache_set only have single cache
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 08:11:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aaf411c3-b58d-91b8-188e-54856ae795e7@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200815041043.45116-3-colyli@suse.de>
On 8/15/20 6:10 AM, Coly Li wrote:
> Currently although the bcache code has a framework for multiple caches
> in a cache set, but indeed the multiple caches never completed and users
> use md raid1 for multiple copies of the cached data.
>
> This patch does the following change in struct cache_set, to explicitly
> make a cache_set only have single cache,
> - Change pointer array "*cache[MAX_CACHES_PER_SET]" to a single pointer
> "*cache".
> - Remove pointer array "*cache_by_alloc[MAX_CACHES_PER_SET]".
> - Remove "caches_loaded".
>
> Now the code looks as exactly what it does in practic: only one cache is
> used in the cache set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
> ---
> drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c | 2 +-
> drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h | 8 +++-----
> drivers/md/bcache/super.c | 19 ++++++++-----------
> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c b/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c
> index 4493ff57476d..3385f6add6df 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c
> @@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ int __bch_bucket_alloc_set(struct cache_set *c, unsigned int reserve,
>
> bkey_init(k);
>
> - ca = c->cache_by_alloc[0];
> + ca = c->cache;
> b = bch_bucket_alloc(ca, reserve, wait);
> if (b == -1)
> goto err;
Maybe drop variable 'ca' altogether?
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h b/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h
> index 5ff6e9573935..aa112c1adba1 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h
> @@ -519,9 +519,7 @@ struct cache_set {
>
> struct cache_sb sb;
>
> - struct cache *cache[MAX_CACHES_PER_SET];
> - struct cache *cache_by_alloc[MAX_CACHES_PER_SET];
> - int caches_loaded;
> + struct cache *cache;
>
> struct bcache_device **devices;
> unsigned int devices_max_used;
> @@ -808,7 +806,7 @@ static inline struct cache *PTR_CACHE(struct cache_set *c,
> const struct bkey *k,
> unsigned int ptr)
> {
> - return c->cache[PTR_DEV(k, ptr)];
> + return c->cache;
> }
>
> static inline size_t PTR_BUCKET_NR(struct cache_set *c,
> @@ -890,7 +888,7 @@ do { \
> /* Looping macros */
>
> #define for_each_cache(ca, cs, iter) \
> - for (iter = 0; ca = cs->cache[iter], iter < (cs)->sb.nr_in_set; iter++)
> + for (iter = 0; ca = cs->cache, iter < 1; iter++)
>
> #define for_each_bucket(b, ca) \
> for (b = (ca)->buckets + (ca)->sb.first_bucket; \
I guess 'for_each_cache' can be killed, too.
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
> index 7057ec48f3d1..e9ccfa17beb8 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
> @@ -1675,7 +1675,7 @@ static void cache_set_free(struct closure *cl)
> for_each_cache(ca, c, i)
> if (ca) {
> ca->set = NULL;
> - c->cache[ca->sb.nr_this_dev] = NULL;
> + c->cache = NULL;
> kobject_put(&ca->kobj);
> }
>
> @@ -2166,7 +2166,7 @@ static const char *register_cache_set(struct cache *ca)
>
> list_for_each_entry(c, &bch_cache_sets, list)
> if (!memcmp(c->sb.set_uuid, ca->sb.set_uuid, 16)) {
> - if (c->cache[ca->sb.nr_this_dev])
> + if (c->cache)
> return "duplicate cache set member";
>
> if (!can_attach_cache(ca, c))
> @@ -2216,14 +2216,11 @@ static const char *register_cache_set(struct cache *ca)
>
> kobject_get(&ca->kobj);
> ca->set = c;
> - ca->set->cache[ca->sb.nr_this_dev] = ca;
> - c->cache_by_alloc[c->caches_loaded++] = ca;
> + ca->set->cache = ca;
>
> - if (c->caches_loaded == c->sb.nr_in_set) {
> - err = "failed to run cache set";
> - if (run_cache_set(c) < 0)
> - goto err;
> - }
> + err = "failed to run cache set";
> + if (run_cache_set(c) < 0)
> + goto err;
>
> return NULL;
> err:
> @@ -2240,8 +2237,8 @@ void bch_cache_release(struct kobject *kobj)
> unsigned int i;
>
> if (ca->set) {
> - BUG_ON(ca->set->cache[ca->sb.nr_this_dev] != ca);
> - ca->set->cache[ca->sb.nr_this_dev] = NULL;
> + BUG_ON(ca->set->cache != ca);
> + ca->set->cache = NULL;
> }
>
> free_pages((unsigned long) ca->disk_buckets, ilog2(meta_bucket_pages(&ca->sb)));
>
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-17 6:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-15 4:10 [PATCH 00/14] bcache: remove multiple caches code framework Coly Li
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 01/14] bcache: remove 'int n' from parameter list of bch_bucket_alloc_set() Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:08 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 02/14] bcache: explicitly make cache_set only have single cache Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:11 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 03/14] bcache: remove for_each_cache() Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:13 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-22 11:40 ` Coly Li
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 04/14] bcache: add set_uuid in struct cache_set Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:15 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 05/14] bcache: only use block_bytes() on struct cache Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:16 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 06/14] bcache: remove useless alloc_bucket_pages() Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:17 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 07/14] bcache: remove useless bucket_pages() Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:18 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 08/14] bcache: only use bucket_bytes() on struct cache Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:19 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 09/14] bcache: avoid data copy between cache_set->sb and cache->sb Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:22 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-17 6:30 ` Coly Li
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 10/14] bcache: don't check seq numbers in register_cache_set() Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:23 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 11/14] bcache: remove can_attach_cache() Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:24 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 12/14] bcache: check and set sync status on cache's in-memory super block Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:25 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 13/14] bcache: remove embedded struct cache_sb from struct cache_set Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:26 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 14/14] bcache: move struct cache_sb out of uapi bcache.h Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:36 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-17 7:10 ` Coly Li
2020-08-17 10:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-17 11:48 ` Coly Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aaf411c3-b58d-91b8-188e-54856ae795e7@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=colyli@suse.de \
--cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox