public inbox for linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Wheeler <bcache@lists.ewheeler.net>
To: Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org>
Cc: Coly Li <i@coly.li>, Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmail.com>,
	linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, kent.overstreet@gmail.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] bcache: explicitly destroy mutex while exiting
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 19:05:45 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.11.1710271903590.24585@mail.ewheeler.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c06f2a04-3654-0bb9-f07d-ee6d2b27868d@lyle.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 1274 bytes --]

On Tue, 10 Oct 2017, Michael Lyle wrote:

> On 10/10/2017 05:25 AM, Coly Li wrote:
> > On 2017/10/10 下午5:00, Liang Chen wrote:
> >> mutex_destroy does nothing most of time, but it's better to call
> >> it to make the code future proof and it also has some meaning
> >> for like mutex debug.
> >>
> >> As Coly pointed out in a previous review, bcache_exit() may not be
> >> able to handle all the references properly if userspace registers
> >> cache and backing devices right before bch_debug_init runs and
> >> bch_debug_init failes later. So not exposing userspace interface
> >> until everything is ready to avoid that issue.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmail.com>
> > 
> > Hi Liang,
> > 
> > No more comment from me, it looks good. Thanks.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
> 
> Looks good to me too.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org>

Should this Cc: stable to avoid the register race (possible 
crash?) described by Liang in other stable kernels?

Reviewed-by: Eric Wheeler <bcache@linux.ewheeler.net>

> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-27 19:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-10  9:00 [PATCH v2] bcache: explicitly destroy mutex while exiting Liang Chen
2017-10-10 12:25 ` Coly Li
2017-10-10 15:44   ` Michael Lyle
2017-10-27 19:05     ` Eric Wheeler [this message]
2017-10-27 19:15       ` Michael Lyle
2017-10-30 12:33     ` Liang C
2017-10-30 18:02       ` Michael Lyle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LRH.2.11.1710271903590.24585@mail.ewheeler.net \
    --to=bcache@lists.ewheeler.net \
    --cc=i@coly.li \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
    --cc=liangchen.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mlyle@lyle.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox