public inbox for linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, mlyle@lyle.org, tang.junhui@zte.com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 05/10] bcache: stop dc->writeback_rate_update if cache set is stopping
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 00:01:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d954882e-de90-abbb-1f01-0625414b4618@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b399ead7-34b4-1dfd-16c3-f506516d4466@suse.de>

On 08/01/2018 3:22 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 01/03/2018 03:03 PM, Coly Li wrote:
>> struct delayed_work writeback_rate_update in struct cache_dev is a delayed
>> worker to call function update_writeback_rate() in period (the interval is
>> defined by dc->writeback_rate_update_seconds).
>>
>> When a metadate I/O error happens on cache device, bcache error handling
>> routine bch_cache_set_error() will call bch_cache_set_unregister() to
>> retire whole cache set. On the unregister code path, cached_dev_free()
>> calls cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dc->writeback_rate_update) to stop this
>> delayed work.
>>
>> dc->writeback_rate_update is a special delayed work from others in bcache.
>> In its routine update_writeback_rate(), this delayed work is re-armed
>> after a piece of time. That means when cancel_delayed_work_sync() returns,
>> this delayed work can still be executed after several seconds defined by
>> dc->writeback_rate_update_seconds.
>>
>> The problem is, after cancel_delayed_work_sync() returns, the cache set
>> unregister code path will eventually release memory of struct cache set.
>> Then the delayed work is scheduled to run, and inside its routine
>> update_writeback_rate() that already released cache set NULL pointer will
>> be accessed. Now a NULL pointer deference panic is triggered.
>>
>> In order to avoid the above problem, this patch checks cache set flags in
>> delayed work routine update_writeback_rate(). If flag CACHE_SET_STOPPING
>> is set, this routine will quit without re-arm the delayed work. Then the
>> NULL pointer deference panic won't happen after cache set is released.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
>> ---
>>  drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c | 9 +++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c b/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c
>> index 0789a9e18337..745d9b2a326f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c
>> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c
>> @@ -91,6 +91,11 @@ static void update_writeback_rate(struct work_struct *work)
>>  	struct cached_dev *dc = container_of(to_delayed_work(work),
>>  					     struct cached_dev,
>>  					     writeback_rate_update);
>> +	struct cache_set *c = dc->disk.c;
>> +
>> +	/* quit directly if cache set is stopping */
>> +	if (test_bit(CACHE_SET_STOPPING, &c->flags))
>> +		return;
>>  
>>  	down_read(&dc->writeback_lock);
>>  
>> @@ -100,6 +105,10 @@ static void update_writeback_rate(struct work_struct *work)
>>  
>>  	up_read(&dc->writeback_lock);
>>  
>> +	/* do not schedule delayed work if cache set is stopping */
>> +	if (test_bit(CACHE_SET_STOPPING, &c->flags))
>> +		return;
>> +
>>  	schedule_delayed_work(&dc->writeback_rate_update,
>>  			      dc->writeback_rate_update_seconds * HZ);
>>  }
>>
> This is actually not quite correct; the function might still be called
> after 'struct cached_dev' has been removed.
> The correct way of fixing is to either take a reference to struct
> cached_dev and release it once 'update_writeback_rate' is finished, or
> to call 'cancel_delayed_work_sync()' before deleting struct cached_dev.

Hi Hannes,

The problem is not cached_dev, it is cache_set. In
__update_writeback_rate(), struct cache_set is referenced. The solutions
is similar as you suggested, call cancel_delayed_work_sync() before
deleting struct cache_set. Junhui posted another patch to fix duplicated
writeback threads issue, but also fixes this problem too. Therefore just
prevent this kworker from re-arm itself again should be enough, and my
next patche to stop dc->writeback_thread and dc->writeback_rate_update
can be ignored, Junhui's patch is in bcache-for-next already.

Thanks.

Coly Li

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-08 16:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-03 14:03 [PATCH v1 00/10] cache device failure handling improvement Coly Li
2018-01-03 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 01/10] bcache: exit bch_writeback_thread() with proper task state Coly Li
2018-01-03 17:08   ` Michael Lyle
2018-01-05 17:05     ` Coly Li
2018-01-05 17:09       ` Michael Lyle
2018-01-08  7:09   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-08 13:50     ` Coly Li
2018-01-03 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 02/10] bcache: set task properly in allocator_wait() Coly Li
2018-01-03 17:09   ` Michael Lyle
2018-01-05 17:11     ` Coly Li
2018-01-08  7:10   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-03 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 03/10] bcache: reduce cache_set devices iteration by devices_max_used Coly Li
2018-01-03 17:11   ` Michael Lyle
2018-01-08  7:12   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-03 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 04/10] bcache: fix cached_dev->count usage for bch_cache_set_error() Coly Li
2018-01-08  7:16   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-03 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 05/10] bcache: stop dc->writeback_rate_update if cache set is stopping Coly Li
2018-01-08  7:22   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-08 16:01     ` Coly Li [this message]
2018-01-03 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 06/10] bcache: stop dc->writeback_rate_update, dc->writeback_thread earlier Coly Li
2018-01-08  7:25   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-03 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 07/10] bcache: set error_limit correctly Coly Li
2018-01-08  7:26   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-03 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 08/10] bcache: fix misleading error message in bch_count_io_errors() Coly Li
2018-01-03 17:14   ` Michael Lyle
2018-01-08  7:27   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-03 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 09/10] bcache: add io_disable to struct cache_set Coly Li
2018-01-08  7:30   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-03 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 10/10] bcache: stop all attached bcache devices for a retired cache set Coly Li
2018-01-08  7:31   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-03 17:07 ` [PATCH v1 00/10] cache device failure handling improvement Michael Lyle
2018-01-04  2:20   ` Coly Li
2018-01-04 17:46     ` Michael Lyle
2018-01-05  4:04       ` Coly Li
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-01-04 12:41 [PATCH v1 05/10] bcache: stop dc->writeback_rate_update if cache set is stopping tang.junhui
2018-01-05  4:01 ` Coly Li
2018-01-03 18:54 tang.junhui
2018-01-04  9:05 ` Coly Li
2018-01-03 16:47 tang.junhui
2018-01-04  8:06 ` Coly Li
2018-01-03 13:15 tang.junhui
2018-01-04  3:32 ` Coly Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d954882e-de90-abbb-1f01-0625414b4618@suse.de \
    --to=colyli@suse.de \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mlyle@lyle.org \
    --cc=tang.junhui@zte.com.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox