From: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] bcache: avoid data copy between cache_set->sb and cache->sb
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 14:30:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f8015707-56c2-9ea9-3580-db698c3cc4cb@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <041fed5e-f54f-d0eb-a5cc-2a52ded7b623@suse.de>
On 2020/8/17 14:22, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 8/15/20 6:10 AM, Coly Li wrote:
>> struct cache_sb embedded in struct cache_set is only partial used and
>> not a real copy from cache's in-memory super block. When removing the
>> embedded cache_set->sb, it is unncessary to copy data between these two
>> in-memory super blocks (cache_set->sb and cache->sb), it is sufficient
>> to just use cache->sb.
>>
>> This patch removes the data copy between these two in-memory super
>> blocks in bch_cache_set_alloc() and bcache_write_super(). In future
>> except for set_uuid, cache's super block will be referenced by cache
>> set, no copy any more.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
>> ---
>> drivers/md/bcache/super.c | 22 +++-------------------
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
>> index 748b08ab4f11..05c5a7e867bb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
>> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
>> @@ -350,16 +350,10 @@ void bcache_write_super(struct cache_set *c)
>> down(&c->sb_write_mutex);
>> closure_init(cl, &c->cl);
>> - c->sb.seq++;
>> + ca->sb.seq++;
>> - if (c->sb.version > version)
>> - version = c->sb.version;
>> -
>> - ca->sb.version = version;
>> - ca->sb.seq = c->sb.seq;
>> - ca->sb.last_mount = c->sb.last_mount;
>> -
>> - SET_CACHE_SYNC(&ca->sb, CACHE_SYNC(&c->sb));
>> + if (ca->sb.version < version)
>> + ca->sb.version = version;
>> bio_init(bio, ca->sb_bv, 1);
>> bio_set_dev(bio, ca->bdev);
>> @@ -1860,16 +1854,6 @@ struct cache_set *bch_cache_set_alloc(struct
>> cache_sb *sb)
>> bch_cache_accounting_init(&c->accounting, &c->cl);
>> memcpy(c->set_uuid, sb->set_uuid, 16);
>> - c->sb.block_size = sb->block_size;
>> - c->sb.bucket_size = sb->bucket_size;
>> - c->sb.nr_in_set = sb->nr_in_set;
>> - c->sb.last_mount = sb->last_mount;
>> - c->sb.version = sb->version;
>> - if (c->sb.version >= BCACHE_SB_VERSION_CDEV_WITH_FEATURES) {
>> - c->sb.feature_compat = sb->feature_compat;
>> - c->sb.feature_ro_compat = sb->feature_ro_compat;
>> - c->sb.feature_incompat = sb->feature_incompat;
>> - }
>> c->bucket_bits = ilog2(sb->bucket_size);
>> c->block_bits = ilog2(sb->block_size);
>>
> Please fold it into patch 13, as then it's obvious why we don't need
> this copy actions anymore.
Sure, I will do it in next version series.
Thanks.
Coly Li
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-17 6:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-15 4:10 [PATCH 00/14] bcache: remove multiple caches code framework Coly Li
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 01/14] bcache: remove 'int n' from parameter list of bch_bucket_alloc_set() Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:08 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 02/14] bcache: explicitly make cache_set only have single cache Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:11 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 03/14] bcache: remove for_each_cache() Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:13 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-22 11:40 ` Coly Li
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 04/14] bcache: add set_uuid in struct cache_set Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:15 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 05/14] bcache: only use block_bytes() on struct cache Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:16 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 06/14] bcache: remove useless alloc_bucket_pages() Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:17 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 07/14] bcache: remove useless bucket_pages() Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:18 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 08/14] bcache: only use bucket_bytes() on struct cache Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:19 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 09/14] bcache: avoid data copy between cache_set->sb and cache->sb Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:22 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-17 6:30 ` Coly Li [this message]
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 10/14] bcache: don't check seq numbers in register_cache_set() Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:23 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 11/14] bcache: remove can_attach_cache() Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:24 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 12/14] bcache: check and set sync status on cache's in-memory super block Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:25 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 13/14] bcache: remove embedded struct cache_sb from struct cache_set Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:26 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-15 4:10 ` [PATCH 14/14] bcache: move struct cache_sb out of uapi bcache.h Coly Li
2020-08-17 6:36 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-17 7:10 ` Coly Li
2020-08-17 10:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-17 11:48 ` Coly Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f8015707-56c2-9ea9-3580-db698c3cc4cb@suse.de \
--to=colyli@suse.de \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox