From: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>,
Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>, Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>,
Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com>,
Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
Eric Wheeler <git@linux.ewheeler.net>,
Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>,
Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
"open list:BCACHE (BLOCK LAYER CACHE)"
<linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:SOFTWARE RAID (Multiple Disks) SUPPORT"
<linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 07/54] bcache: comment on direct access to bvec table
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 00:56:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f88ea6e0-d2e4-15ea-0eb6-19be3d9d317d@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1482854250-13481-8-git-send-email-tom.leiming@gmail.com>
On 2016/12/27 下午11:55, Ming Lei wrote:
> Looks all are safe after multipage bvec is supported.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/md/bcache/btree.c | 1 +
> drivers/md/bcache/super.c | 6 ++++++
> drivers/md/bcache/util.c | 7 +++++++
> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
> index a43eedd5804d..fc35cfb4d0f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
> @@ -428,6 +428,7 @@ static void do_btree_node_write(struct btree *b)
>
> continue_at(cl, btree_node_write_done, NULL);
> } else {
> + /* No harm for multipage bvec since the new is just allocated */
> b->bio->bi_vcnt = 0;
> bch_bio_map(b->bio, i);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
> index 3a19cbc8b230..607b022259dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
> @@ -208,6 +208,7 @@ static void write_bdev_super_endio(struct bio *bio)
>
> static void __write_super(struct cache_sb *sb, struct bio *bio)
> {
> + /* single page bio, safe for multipage bvec */
> struct cache_sb *out = page_address(bio->bi_io_vec[0].bv_page);
> unsigned i;
>
> @@ -1156,6 +1157,8 @@ static void register_bdev(struct cache_sb *sb, struct page *sb_page,
> dc->bdev->bd_holder = dc;
>
> bio_init(&dc->sb_bio, dc->sb_bio.bi_inline_vecs, 1);
> +
> + /* single page bio, safe for multipage bvec */
> dc->sb_bio.bi_io_vec[0].bv_page = sb_page;
> get_page(sb_page);
>
> @@ -1799,6 +1802,7 @@ void bch_cache_release(struct kobject *kobj)
> for (i = 0; i < RESERVE_NR; i++)
> free_fifo(&ca->free[i]);
>
> + /* single page bio, safe for multipage bvec */
> if (ca->sb_bio.bi_inline_vecs[0].bv_page)
> put_page(ca->sb_bio.bi_io_vec[0].bv_page);
>
> @@ -1854,6 +1858,8 @@ static int register_cache(struct cache_sb *sb, struct page *sb_page,
> ca->bdev->bd_holder = ca;
>
> bio_init(&ca->sb_bio, ca->sb_bio.bi_inline_vecs, 1);
> +
> + /* single page bio, safe for multipage bvec */
> ca->sb_bio.bi_io_vec[0].bv_page = sb_page;
> get_page(sb_page);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/util.c b/drivers/md/bcache/util.c
> index dde6172f3f10..5cc0b49a65fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/util.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/util.c
> @@ -222,6 +222,13 @@ uint64_t bch_next_delay(struct bch_ratelimit *d, uint64_t done)
> : 0;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Generally it isn't good to access .bi_io_vec and .bi_vcnt
> + * directly, the preferred way is bio_add_page, but in
> + * this case, bch_bio_map() supposes that the bvec table
> + * is empty, so it is safe to access .bi_vcnt & .bi_io_vec
> + * in this way even after multipage bvec is supported.
> + */
> void bch_bio_map(struct bio *bio, void *base)
> {
> size_t size = bio->bi_iter.bi_size;
>
Acked-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-30 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-27 15:55 [PATCH v1 00/54] block: support multipage bvec Ming Lei
2016-12-27 15:55 ` [PATCH v1 07/54] bcache: comment on direct access to bvec table Ming Lei
2016-12-30 16:56 ` Coly Li [this message]
2016-12-27 15:55 ` [PATCH v1 08/54] block: comment on bio_alloc_pages() Ming Lei
2016-12-30 10:40 ` Coly Li
2016-12-30 11:06 ` Coly Li
2016-12-27 15:56 ` [PATCH v1 23/54] bcache: handle bio_clone() & bvec updating for multipage bvecs Ming Lei
2016-12-30 11:01 ` Coly Li
2016-12-31 10:29 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f88ea6e0-d2e4-15ea-0eb6-19be3d9d317d@suse.de \
--to=colyli@suse.de \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=git@linux.ewheeler.net \
--cc=gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com \
--cc=gqjiang@suse.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchristi@redhat.com \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox