From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gabriel de Perthuis Subject: Re: bcache-tools: minor change for bcache-register Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:45:55 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <521B1C5E.2090007@rolffokkens.nl> <20130826214155.GA2798@kmo-pixel> <521C4E2B.8090008@rolffokkens.nl> <521C78B8.7060402@grnet.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Sender: linux-bcache-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:00:24 +0300, Alex Pyrgiotis wrote: > On 08/27/2013 09:58 AM, Rolf Fokkens wrote: >> -modprobe -qba bcache >> +/sbin/modprobe -qba bcache >> test -f /sys/fs/bcache/register_quiet && echo "$1" > >> /sys/fs/bcache/register_quiet >> >> /sbin is not in the $PATH for utilities started from udev. For Fedora it >> isn't anyway, but it won't harm other distro's neither. >> > > Hi all, > > Pardon the interrupt, but this is not the case for Arch Linux: > https://www.archlinux.org/news/binaries-move-to-usrbin-requiring-update-intervention/ > > In my opinion, if modprobe *has* to be called with the exact path name, > it would probably be clearer to use `which modprobe` and then call the > result. IME the exact path name is unnecessary. Rolf, your best shot at contributing is to bring up problems that have actually been encountered on Fedora. Changes need to come as a side effect of discussions, not the other way around.