public inbox for linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Cc: AP <lkml@inml.grue.cc>, linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Error while unlocking encrypted BCacheFS: Required key not available
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 12:58:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <12360099.O9o76ZdvQC@lichtvoll.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4msliytwmws5zsxv2zbczxoce26bgxrmccpjphfvimcicwfipq@7hwgt4qvhozv>

Hi!

Kent Overstreet - 10.01.24, 20:13:59 CET:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 03:18:55PM +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > AP - 10.01.24, 03:13:01 CET:
> > > On Sun, Jan 07, 2024 at 12:27:29PM +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > > > In case this is an issue with Debian packaging of bcachefs-tools I
> > > > can
> > > > report there.
> > > 
> > > What version of bcachefs-tools are you using? The default one in
> > > bookworm is v0.24 and is >1 year old and that may be the issue.
> > 
> > As I wrote:
> > 
> > "BCacheFS tools 1.3.3 – according to bcachefs version – from Debian
> > package bcachefs-tools 24+really1.3.4-2.".
> > 
> > > I'm starting to switch from btrfs to bcachefs and I backported
> > > v1.3.4
> > > from sid.
> > 
> > That is where above package is from.
> 
> The keyring stuff has been a perpetual utter headache.
> 
> I've been debating rewriting that stuff to just pass a memfd handle as a
> mount option and rip out keyring usage...
> 
> alternately - now that we're pretty much always mounting via the mount
> helper, perhaps it would be a little bit less fragile if the mount
> helper was adding the key to the keyring - that might be worth checking.

So no suggestion what to try to make it work except for putting BCacheFS 
unto LUKS? I wanted to get rid of LUKS for removable media. Often enough I 
have "cryptsetup luksClose" complaining about still in use while I the 
filesystem on top of it clearly got unmounted already. In these case BTRFS 
still.

Ciao,
-- 
Martin



  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-11 11:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-07 11:22 Error while unlocking encrypted BCacheFS: Required key not available Martin Steigerwald
2024-01-07 11:27 ` Martin Steigerwald
2024-01-10  2:13   ` AP
2024-01-10 14:18     ` Martin Steigerwald
2024-01-10 19:13       ` Kent Overstreet
2024-01-11 11:58         ` Martin Steigerwald [this message]
2024-01-11 16:35           ` Kent Overstreet
2024-01-11 18:23             ` Martin Steigerwald
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-01-16 17:59 George Hilliard
2024-01-16 18:20 ` Martin Steigerwald
2024-02-10 18:34 ` Martin Steigerwald

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=12360099.O9o76ZdvQC@lichtvoll.de \
    --to=martin@lichtvoll.de \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkml@inml.grue.cc \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox