From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com>
Cc: colyli@suse.de, kent.overstreet@linux.dev, msakai@redhat.com,
corbet@lwn.net, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
namhyung@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
jolsa@kernel.org, irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
kan.liang@linux.intel.com, jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org,
dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] lib/min_heap: Introduce non-inline versions of min heap API functions
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:20:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241014082041.GN33184@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241014081358.GS17263@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 10:13:58AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 02:47:01AM +0800, Kuan-Wei Chiu wrote:
> > All current min heap API functions are marked with '__always_inline'.
> > However, as the number of users increases, inlining these functions
> > everywhere leads to a significant increase in kernel size.
> >
> > In performance-critical paths, such as when perf events are enabled and
> > min heap functions are called on every context switch, it is important
> > to retain the inline versions for optimal performance. To balance this,
> > the original inline functions are kept, and additional non-inline
> > versions of the functions have been added in lib/min_heap.c.
>
> The reason it is all __always_inline is because then the whole
> min_heap_callbacks thing can be constant propagated and the func->less()
> etc calls become direct calls.
Or better, they can get inlined too.
> Doing out of line for this stuff, makes them indirect calls, and
> indirect calls are super retarded expensive ever since spectre. But also
> things like kCFI add significant cost to indirect calls.
>
> Something that would be a trivial subtract instruction becomes this
> giant mess of an indirect function call.
>
> Given the whole min_heap thing is basically a ton of less() and swp()
> calls, I really don't think this trade off makes any kind of sense.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-14 8:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-13 18:47 [PATCH 0/3] Enhance min heap API with non-inline functions and optimizations Kuan-Wei Chiu
2024-10-13 18:47 ` [PATCH 1/3] lib/min_heap: Introduce non-inline versions of min heap API functions Kuan-Wei Chiu
2024-10-14 8:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-14 8:20 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2024-10-14 9:41 ` Kuan-Wei Chiu
2024-10-17 3:26 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-10-17 9:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-17 10:46 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-10-20 5:15 ` Kuan-Wei Chiu
2024-10-13 18:47 ` [PATCH 2/3] lib min_heap: Optimize min heap by prescaling counters for better performance Kuan-Wei Chiu
2024-10-13 18:47 ` [PATCH 3/3] Documentation/core-api: Add min heap API introduction Kuan-Wei Chiu
2024-10-14 8:55 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-10-14 10:04 ` Kuan-Wei Chiu
2024-10-13 23:05 ` [PATCH 0/3] Enhance min heap API with non-inline functions and optimizations Kent Overstreet
2024-10-13 23:27 ` Kuan-Wei Chiu
2024-10-14 2:08 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-10-14 1:18 ` Coly Li
2024-10-14 1:23 ` Kent Overstreet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241014082041.GN33184@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=colyli@suse.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=msakai@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=visitorckw@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox