From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Andrea Cervesato <andrea.cervesato@suse.de>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it, Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>,
linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>, Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] ioctl_ficlone03: fix capabilities on immutable files
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 14:47:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250326134749.GA45449@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250326-fix_ioctl_ficlone03_32bit_bcachefs-v1-1-554a0315ebf5@suse.com>
Hi all,
[ Cc Kent and other filesystem folks to be sure we don't hide a bug ]
> From: Andrea Cervesato <andrea.cervesato@suse.com>
> Make sure that capabilities requirements are satisfied when accessing
> immutable files. On OpenSUSE Tumbleweed 32bit bcachefs fails with the
> following error due to missing capabilities:
> tst_test.c:1833: TINFO: === Testing on bcachefs ===
> ..
> ioctl_ficlone03.c:74: TBROK: ioctl .. failed: ENOTTY (25)
> ioctl_ficlone03.c:89: TWARN: ioctl .. failed: ENOTTY (25)
> ioctl_ficlone03.c:91: TWARN: ioctl .. failed: ENOTTY (25)
> ioctl_ficlone03.c:98: TWARN: close(-1) failed: EBADF (9)
> Introduce CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE capability to make sure that test won't
> fail on other systems as well.
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Cervesato <andrea.cervesato@suse.com>
> ---
> testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_ficlone03.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_ficlone03.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_ficlone03.c
> index 6a9d270d9fb56f3a263f0aed976f62c4576e6a5f..6716423d9c96d9fc1d433f28e0ae1511b912ae2c 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_ficlone03.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_ficlone03.c
> @@ -122,5 +122,9 @@ static struct tst_test test = {
> .bufs = (struct tst_buffers []) {
> {&clone_range, .size = sizeof(struct file_clone_range)},
> {},
> - }
> + },
> + .caps = (struct tst_cap []) {
> + TST_CAP(TST_CAP_REQ, CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE),
> + {}
> + },
Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
LGTM, obviously it is CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE related.
This looks like fs/bcachefs/fs-ioctl.c
static int bch2_inode_flags_set(struct btree_trans *trans,
struct bch_inode_info *inode,
struct bch_inode_unpacked *bi,
void *p)
{
...
if (((newflags ^ oldflags) & (BCH_INODE_append|BCH_INODE_immutable)) &&
!capable(CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE))
return -EPERM;
We don't test on vfat and exfat. If I try to do it fail the same way (bcachefs,
fat, exfat and ocfs2 use custom handler for FAT_IOCTL_SET_ATTRIBUTES).
I wonder why it does not fail for generic VFS fs/ioctl.c used by Btrfs and XFS:
/*
* Generic function to check FS_IOC_FSSETXATTR/FS_IOC_SETFLAGS values and reject
* any invalid configurations.
*
* Note: must be called with inode lock held.
*/
static int fileattr_set_prepare(struct inode *inode,
const struct fileattr *old_ma,
struct fileattr *fa)
{
int err;
/*
* The IMMUTABLE and APPEND_ONLY flags can only be changed by
* the relevant capability.
*/
if ((fa->flags ^ old_ma->flags) & (FS_APPEND_FL | FS_IMMUTABLE_FL) &&
!capable(CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE))
return -EPERM;
Kind regards,
Petr
> };
> ---
> base-commit: 753bd13472d4be44eb70ff183b007fe9c5fffa07
> change-id: 20250326-fix_ioctl_ficlone03_32bit_bcachefs-2ec15bd6c0c6
> Best regards,
next parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-26 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20250326-fix_ioctl_ficlone03_32bit_bcachefs-v1-1-554a0315ebf5@suse.com>
2025-03-26 13:47 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2025-03-26 14:12 ` [LTP] [PATCH] ioctl_ficlone03: fix capabilities on immutable files Kent Overstreet
2025-03-26 18:42 ` Petr Vorel
2025-03-27 0:49 ` Dave Chinner
2025-03-28 16:26 ` Kent Overstreet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250326134749.GA45449@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=andrea.cervesato@suse.de \
--cc=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liwang@redhat.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox