public inbox for linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikita Ofitserov via B4 Relay <devnull+himikof.gmail.com@kernel.org>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Cc: linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org, Nikita Ofitserov <himikof@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 01/15] bcachefs: Introduce btree_leaf_has_triggers_mask
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 17:16:03 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250828-better-progress-v2-1-c088a2003940@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250828-better-progress-v2-0-c088a2003940@gmail.com>

From: Nikita Ofitserov <himikof@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: Nikita Ofitserov <himikof@gmail.com>
---
 fs/bcachefs/btree_gc.c    | 2 +-
 fs/bcachefs/btree_types.h | 3 +++
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/btree_gc.c b/fs/bcachefs/btree_gc.c
index 43f294284d57473fd8868c974c4bdd847fcf2636..2b1b6b7ffdf0af7ec0bf4cbaf68cc9a53a20cfce 100644
--- a/fs/bcachefs/btree_gc.c
+++ b/fs/bcachefs/btree_gc.c
@@ -720,7 +720,7 @@ static int bch2_gc_btree(struct btree_trans *trans,
 			 enum btree_id btree, bool initial)
 {
 	struct bch_fs *c = trans->c;
-	unsigned target_depth = btree_node_type_has_triggers(__btree_node_type(0, btree)) ? 0 : 1;
+	unsigned target_depth = BIT_ULL(btree) & btree_leaf_has_triggers_mask ? 0 : 1;
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	/* We need to make sure every leaf node is readable before going RW */
diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/btree_types.h b/fs/bcachefs/btree_types.h
index e893eb938bb3da441f0ab0096ced3cc3c2a701e2..ad9bd18fe9b6e51987da74d373830dca98df56ec 100644
--- a/fs/bcachefs/btree_types.h
+++ b/fs/bcachefs/btree_types.h
@@ -840,6 +840,9 @@ static inline bool btree_node_type_has_triggers(enum btree_node_type type)
 	return BIT_ULL(type) & BTREE_NODE_TYPE_HAS_TRIGGERS;
 }
 
+/* A mask of btree id bits that have triggers for their leaves */
+static const u64 btree_leaf_has_triggers_mask = BTREE_NODE_TYPE_HAS_TRIGGERS >> 1;
+
 static const u64 btree_is_extents_mask = 0
 #define x(name, nr, flags, ...)	|((!!((flags) & BTREE_IS_extents)) << nr)
 BCH_BTREE_IDS()

-- 
2.50.1



  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-28 14:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-28 14:16 [PATCH v2 00/15] Accounting for accurate progress reporting Nikita Ofitserov via B4 Relay
2025-08-28 14:16 ` Nikita Ofitserov via B4 Relay [this message]
2025-08-28 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] bcachefs: Refactor bch2_gc_btree/bch2_gc_btrees Nikita Ofitserov via B4 Relay
2025-08-28 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] bcachefs: Improve check_allocations pass speed when not in fsck Nikita Ofitserov via B4 Relay
2025-08-28 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] bcachefs: Refactor/rename btree_type_has_ptrs Nikita Ofitserov via B4 Relay
2025-08-28 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] bcachefs: Fix progress reporting for unknown btrees Nikita Ofitserov via B4 Relay
2025-08-28 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] bcachefs: Partially fix old device removal with " Nikita Ofitserov via B4 Relay
2025-08-28 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] bcachefs: Fix missing c->usage updates from early recovery Nikita Ofitserov via B4 Relay
2025-09-01 23:55   ` Kent Overstreet
2025-08-28 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] bcachefs: Optimize/fix bch2_dev_usage_remove Nikita Ofitserov via B4 Relay
2025-08-28 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] bcachefs: Fix online hidden (sb+journal) data accounting Nikita Ofitserov via B4 Relay
2025-09-02  0:14   ` Kent Overstreet
2025-08-28 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] bcachefs: Fix outdated documentation comment Nikita Ofitserov via B4 Relay
2025-08-28 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] bcachefs: Relax restrictions on the number of accounting counters Nikita Ofitserov via B4 Relay
2025-08-28 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] bcachefs: bcachefs_metadata_version_btree_node_accounting Nikita Ofitserov via B4 Relay
2025-08-28 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] bcachefs: Use explicit node counts in progress reporting Nikita Ofitserov via B4 Relay
2025-08-28 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] bcachefs: Better progress reporting for btree iteration without leaves Nikita Ofitserov via B4 Relay
2025-08-28 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] bcachefs: More accurate progress reporting for inner node iteration Nikita Ofitserov via B4 Relay
2025-09-01 22:33 ` [PATCH v2 00/15] Accounting for accurate progress reporting Kent Overstreet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250828-better-progress-v2-1-c088a2003940@gmail.com \
    --to=devnull+himikof.gmail.com@kernel.org \
    --cc=himikof@gmail.com \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox