From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.lichtvoll.de (lichtvoll.de [37.120.160.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 185CEB663; Sun, 10 Aug 2025 10:22:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=37.120.160.25 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754821359; cv=none; b=dF8ZvCwIdGJsSyOANRXDMplxtZtHOzZwaNSu/AH7E+YliAP/fXPbakqoidgsYGVT9+7IeJmIaW2izkDkaADNyak8yJqJU7aqJQ70zofL7ntarIHPAt03QCRtq0hTVYgCdxKllTwouRKf/zRGLdjWbWSnH09pGkLpQL0OtEG/RQk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754821359; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0I9+2+UqEr/TPvVHGXFmqel3QSDQnTF6p3y0uqQOGzU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=bThPm1W2do0BOoqJtlX3Qpq+Pz4KyfLK/Sp7NoKpGfs7k+mpoD6rAuk9dg+9SgTouRn+voJQk51CgSCiyE/N9YtwR4/mkcgn4Y2Czp68T0yFgqGNgGg286NUybcjEFwko/o1/NzIK9+ev8wj11ol1HUttnwNGIdB+yPegfVlL2g= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lichtvoll.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lichtvoll.de; arc=none smtp.client-ip=37.120.160.25 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lichtvoll.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lichtvoll.de Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by mail.lichtvoll.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4418412E120; Sun, 10 Aug 2025 10:22:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.lichtvoll.de; auth=pass smtp.auth=martin@lichtvoll.de smtp.mailfrom=martin@lichtvoll.de From: Martin Steigerwald To: "Gerald B. Cox" , Theodore Ts'o Cc: Kent Overstreet , Sasha Levin , Josef Bacik , Aquinas Admin , Malte =?UTF-8?B?U2NocsO2ZGVy?= , Linus Torvalds , "Carl E. Thompson" , linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] bcachefs changes for 6.17 Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2025 12:22:30 +0200 Message-ID: <3371119.aeNJFYEL58@lichtvoll.de> In-Reply-To: <20250810055955.GA984814@mit.edu> References: <1869778184.298.1754433695609@mail.carlthompson.net> <20250810055955.GA984814@mit.edu> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hi Theodore, hi, Theodore Ts'o - 10.08.25, 07:59:55 CEST: > On Sat, Aug 09, 2025 at 09:26:16PM -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > > And really, this whole thread feels beneath what the kernel community > > should be. If there=E2=80=99s a serious question about bcachefs=E2=80= =99s future, it > > ought to be a quiet, direct conversation between Kent and Linus=E2=80= =94not a > > public spectacle. >=20 > There has been private conversations with Kent. I will note that it > was *Kent* who started this most recent round of e-mails[1]. In his > e-mail, He slammed the Linux Kernel's "engineering standards", and > btrfs in particular. I won't quote any of it here, because it really > is quite toxic, but please note that it was Kent who started the > discussion about btrfs. This kind of attack is Just Not Helpful, and > this kind of behavior is, unfortunately, quite common coming from > Kent. >=20 > [1] > https://lore.kernel.org/all/3ik3h6hfm4v2y3rtpjshk5y4wlm5n366overw2lp72q > k5izizw@k6vxp22uwnwa/ I kind of agree that this thread would have gone better without this mail=20 from Kent. Best, =2D-=20 Martin