From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19BE235334D; Wed, 20 Aug 2025 01:18:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755652731; cv=none; b=qizGQ4Wy8zySS9xC0bY0qhwJETrld+OJU7zJsiKX199iRnvfEaTlrmpVG0JqBUqvwpEWxy1RMPR6hhzHMnn+3Nbce6pJaRrbjBs9BN0cV5XfTz5d3NnHnv5GrBx0VTqGbq4ZbO6I2bggatd555bgIqwTaGQ2RI328E0uMDIF6ec= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755652731; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Zc8KTvnnxKKucPRYOFGi/LfFPLjaylS9ofv+IXSkWSQ=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=r+qAFaMN/2aa9GZ+3lfuqiLE3HkFVMvk8YzZQ2BvN/zA66ochP4h/HGU2nOG79IBIKdG7QM17cVq2hYrIFMKPhSNcZDjBez8Uaaxs9gbyCzvSAprZA3MW7qfXhbcs3/qNWOAc+v1fY+OdjkoTDZQqkpHQXgTpV+Pzjijybg4hhE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=SXxvhSF+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="SXxvhSF+" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=BiSimGacYECh9jzeLaODztaxsvnVtzIqcHjbY7zbm58=; b=SXxvhSF+IF2PyIMFltha02LLVP qAjDNq5bB3dA+uHo8m/4QiFzvkkcVsl5J6vsCyGmXtwRrBSXisM8Kd1HtY97RhWBD2qIgKOLCBc+1 q7uIni4hKs+8L+gajwkGDJ+7HCzrpOzojE8VdQ6vZPyDpnv1NOvtZRdSn++CCTyO7SD0Tl1ER6bae VWEVdGX2fawYNP1AOs/NzWOSgjWL46gI7wSL5y04hyNqAr15hQ9fxBqLUzCkeNgtGZPG85u4ao+3m honXxKxwgNjExj6+FIKdhJZ5GfbDXzDI8YGUOR2bZbIlplqz0NhZplaU7USP6UPkvDRtAR5yrEaBN hQNUE2sw==; Received: from [50.53.25.54] (helo=[192.168.254.17]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uoXTT-0000000C4M6-2w7b; Wed, 20 Aug 2025 01:18:47 +0000 Message-ID: <33d4f923-250b-48f0-b5f5-664f09a2edf5@infradead.org> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 18:18:47 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: bcachefs: Add explicit title for idle work design doc To: Bagas Sanjaya , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Documentation , Linux bcachefs Cc: Kent Overstreet , Jonathan Corbet References: <20250820002218.11547-1-bagasdotme@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Randy Dunlap In-Reply-To: <20250820002218.11547-1-bagasdotme@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, On 8/19/25 5:22 PM, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > Commit 9e260e4590e044 ("docs: bcachefs: idle work scheduling design doc") > adds design doc (desiderata) for idle work scheduling, but missed > explicit title, causing its two section headings to be toctree entries > instead. > > Add the title. > > Fixes: 9e260e4590e0 ("docs: bcachefs: idle work scheduling design doc") > Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya > --- > Documentation/filesystems/bcachefs/future/idle_work.rst | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/bcachefs/future/idle_work.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/bcachefs/future/idle_work.rst > index 59a332509dcd97..30f2844c3d9e5e 100644 > --- a/Documentation/filesystems/bcachefs/future/idle_work.rst > +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/bcachefs/future/idle_work.rst > @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ > -Idle/background work classes design doc: > +Idle/background work classes desiderata > +======================================= I agree with the underline change and tested it. However, I don't care for the change in the wording. > > Right now, our behaviour at idle isn't ideal, it was designed for servers that > would be under sustained load, to keep pending work at a "medium" level, to > > base-commit: 37c52167b007d9d0bb8c5ed53dd6efc4969a1356 Tested-by: Randy Dunlap -- ~Randy