From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mout01.posteo.de (mout01.posteo.de [185.67.36.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E1C4800 for ; Wed, 24 Dec 2025 16:11:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.67.36.65 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766592684; cv=none; b=Lm9UGPhxdGHxevLnwsgBfUFHDZIjFrXVCjiCdycjZ6xaDSHwkUf03jFLIHi+jE1aLqiXBsA93kbKG07WbY/LghCuO8NRTY9HPIQFGCoj2cra+LRPIEg0xa2W4feSlUntsLdQhpXgXU4pJeq56ibdMIyFtJenNZx0a4/EKLUl3cI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766592684; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yOQIVkFT+LuMcpaGrlN55edyn22cjwM/FXq4cCTbBeE=; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Message-ID:Content-Type; b=lGJRgTjhi5s86E0Ap2UAGssqHbboOF+kWcu9QSx3ZlKxwVSEpJENjPvVkmRCQ7t9mwd0Hn5RUALTOevTe4i9ARN9ZAl7chKHMSu/0OLF2c/5zRMe1Hw4xmzTEqyvW8wH1T270WnCBscOJ33eUOkXX0WyY9GM86EzSrjZf+HuoaY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=posteo.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=posteo.net header.i=@posteo.net header.b=KqSO5tta; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.67.36.65 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=posteo.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=posteo.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=posteo.net header.i=@posteo.net header.b="KqSO5tta" Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A290B240027 for ; Wed, 24 Dec 2025 17:11:20 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1766592680; bh=wK+ZV9aiiOJVATh4aSZXX7E7hSR70g95jO73umAF6UU=; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:From; b=KqSO5ttak98UDm6ylHVMEtcvz3pXrGkLrBX1VozimuS7YE6ci22hfWnrCCntfc/6C yb4jJajQm1jFTY5wK8G1OWkupU/ksMgF/F+yAbZeZXJVMM8c9hCRe36th+teNM/R3g ouUNRRqMC/41/2J6Pm08Y/mWfZwBOy0Sd733/ZfxsqDbBPemH1M9zfjJ5HO8DmX+/5 SAU+Gq7OczvrMzZSol1Cjxx/l+So1wkimf20gdUHDgpt6p7nEQJcw7ldrEhcvOLHXf iGL5hQ4IOq6GP3Q685ObWaWSz0xKIDciJBa3E0WjK8HhvfEysCGwZQaYOrlwhsWnhn TOIr6/QKRsmew== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4dbxh82bSvz6tvZ for ; Wed, 24 Dec 2025 17:11:20 +0100 (CET) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2025 16:11:20 +0000 From: BP25 To: linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Version Control capabilities plus two small unrelated questions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <57dfdd78aed6d071d4b978b233680a0e@posteo.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Note that when I use the word "snapshotted" by saying snapshotted file or snapshotted version of a file, I mean both "A: file that is included in the snapshot of a certain volume", and "B: file that was individually snapshotted to save a version of it". In fact I think that, if individual-file versioning is indeed possible as the first part of my question asks, then taking meaning A: or taking meaning B: is irrelevant because the code would be essentially the same.