From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30D9D19E992; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 14:07:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725286061; cv=none; b=TMzMBPhDub67m5ExAFA2I3lOCuoNOjy9XhW6Kat/o87DLAfFxRZyYP9MOFK/H1yRwnevw+8QXF3trYa0S3OYtO66DbQh4gXPfTBt5o6EvYBuCxm2rZVbXwAZe0Y+2pq4tgksazV+BksYecuZ6NxbsZ9xasbqg/O2fmiapX3X/vY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725286061; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+/UPlFMaAq5gLKfLwgisGqB+Y16NZKUz6wSMIpBVEnI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=RrOWL7vn4TcJ6vAJ1QjrKDhDC8SwDKh40qnh22cHcxOpByDRp60Z5Smz4J+l2OcTP3CrmMxSXBWIralprZoT0NdaREzfL/n6p8zIUhzCaOCy5UTLOHRplI9OHnB9nByPQO2oR4vK32ddR8SUiCoIHqVYDoNvDknR4REypTWuNiE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=PX6JQw+N; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="PX6JQw+N" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net DF6FA418A0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1725286055; bh=QWc1Y13ydYZB7h7+cUcpghnJ2c0RtmcenUjX78aFysM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=PX6JQw+NC0k3lK4CM+m6IAaXsrQb33IN0FRC6zoplOWRFcXR/uraR6FHkZokKoaql chcVWy5Dvet0nkcqGXdVRdWdQpVMz88ygoJZJvOIkmv7kU5W5YzU5c+5Hixl8JM+EK QswM3xSZksU5aCvjysMyOALQiChqWui0zDTBuVZJxy/QM/5jT/AHnBDC/x9rI/nIPb 04CmZcX9kuNstEK4rL2IsQonk4rM/qKXWPFiB8m9A+PJcvMOBat/UZw7GA9U/RhodN PTfZ+au+v1126wrzmke7Ssl/4JTLHoYypq6O63YpDKT6Tk/v+0N+mfCNqGF+uK9a3k Q2T3PBFHAlYgQ== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:5e00:625::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF6FA418A0; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 14:07:34 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Kent Overstreet , Michal Hocko Cc: Dave Chinner , Andrew Morton , Christoph Hellwig , Yafang Shao , jack@suse.cz, Christian Brauner , Alexander Viro , Paul Moore , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] bcachefs: do not use PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM In-Reply-To: References: <20240827061543.1235703-1-mhocko@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2024 08:07:33 -0600 Message-ID: <8734mitahm.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Kent Overstreet writes: > You're arguing against basic precepts of kernel programming. > > Get your head examined. And get the fuck out of here with this shit. Kent, this is not the way to deal with your peers in this community, no matter how strongly you disagree with them. Might I suggest calming down a bit, followed by an apology? Thanks, jon