public inbox for linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Cc: linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] bcachefs fio lockup via generic/703
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 15:13:04 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zd+T0EeeodCXKqQt@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <izlhsoadddmmfyc64pc557tx3lk3vtu7ycwu3ahryh2r3o6nj5@eaqsftsh7kv3>

On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 03:03:06PM -0500, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 02:47:26PM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> > Hi Kent,
> > 
> > Firstly, I confirmed that today's master seems to avoid the splat I sent
> > previously (re: your comment about a reverse journal replay patch or
> > some such).
> > 
> > I still reproduce the stall issue on this system. After peeling away at
> > it, I was eventually able to reproduce without the drop writes
> > (dm-flakey) behavior from the test, and with fio using either the libaio
> > or sync I/O engine options. The sync I/O mode fortunately provides a
> > more useful stack trace:
> > 
> > # cat /proc/177747/stack 
> > [<0>] bch2_dio_write_flush+0x122/0x160 [bcachefs]
> > [<0>] bch2_direct_write+0xb53/0xce0 [bcachefs]
> > [<0>] bch2_write_iter+0x142/0xc70 [bcachefs]
> > [<0>] vfs_write+0x29b/0x470
> > [<0>] ksys_write+0x6f/0xf0
> > [<0>] do_syscall_64+0x86/0x170
> > [<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76
> > 
> > ... which resolves down to the closure_sync() call in
> > bch2_dio_write_flush(). The problem seems to go away if I remove the
> > preceding journal flush from that function. This seems to rule out
> > io_uring/aio and instead suggest that we're getting stuck somehow
> > waiting on a journal flush.
> > 
> > Based on that I went back to the first commit before 746a33c96b7a0
> > ("bcachefs: better journal pipelining"). With that, I can run hundreds
> > of iterations of generic/703 without a problem, so this appears to be a
> > regression associated with the journal pipeline improvements. I'm
> > currently re-running on the last known good commit with my test tweaks
> > backed out (i.e. so back to io_uring and drop writes) just to
> > corroborate that it's the same problem, but so far it's running as
> > expected...
> 
> So I suppose the journal must be getting stuck, and a journal write
> isn't completing - what does sysfs internal/journal_debug say when it happens?
> 

dirty journal entries:  0/32768
seq:                    11
seq_ondisk:             11
last_seq:               12
last_seq_ondisk:        11
flushed_seq_ondisk:     11
watermark:              stripe
each entry reserved:    346
nr flush writes:        10
nr noflush writes:      1
average write size:     10.9 KiB
nr direct reclaim:      0
nr background reclaim:  25
reclaim kicked:         0
reclaim runs in:        0 ms
current entry sectors:  512
current entry error:    ok
current entry:          closed
unwritten entries:
last buf closed
replay done:            1
space:
        discarded       512:244736
        clean ondisk    512:244736
        clean           512:244736
        total           512:245760
dev 0:
        nr              480
        bucket size     512
        available       478:266
        discard_idx     1
        dirty_ondisk    1 (seq 11)
        dirty_idx       1 (seq 11)
        cur_idx         1 (seq 11)


  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-28 20:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-28 19:47 [BUG] bcachefs fio lockup via generic/703 Brian Foster
2024-02-28 20:03 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-02-28 20:13   ` Brian Foster [this message]
2024-02-28 23:43     ` Kent Overstreet
2024-02-29  0:02     ` Kent Overstreet
2024-02-29  2:59       ` Kent Overstreet
2024-02-29 15:55         ` Brian Foster
2024-02-29 16:24           ` Kent Overstreet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zd+T0EeeodCXKqQt@bfoster \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox